Best time to wait for the improvement of the sperm parameter after varicocelectomy: 3 or 6 months?
https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.3.259
Accepted: February 17, 2020
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Objective: To estimate the duration of time required following varicocelectomy to wait for the improvements of semen parameters. Therefore, we characterized the changes with the time in sperm parameters in men after varicocelectomy.
Materials and methods: In this prospective cohort study we included consecutively observed men who underwent varicocelectomy between September 2017 and September 2018 in a referral academic hospital. Clinical data of the patients, as well as their semen parameters, were measured before surgery and at 3 and 6 months afterward.
Results: In this study, a total of 100 men with average age of 29.5 ± 6.2 years were included. Mean sperm concentration and sperm motility significantly improved by 3 (p < 0.05), but not by 6 months following varicocelectomy. The semen volume and sperm with normal morphology were the same before and after surgery (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the improvement of semen parameters when comparing 6 months to 3 months postoperatively (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Sperm parameters (concentration and motility) improve by 3 months after varicocelectomy without further improvements. Consequently, physicians should decide quickly after 3-month of varicocelectomy if surgery has been not helpful and then plan other therapies, like assisted reproductive technology (ART) for managing infertility in couples.
Chen YW, Niu YH, Wang DQ, Li H, Pokhrel G, Xu H, et al. Effect of adjuvant drug therapy after varicocelectomy on fertility outcome in males with varicocele-associated infertility: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrologia. 2018;50(8):e13070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13070
Vahidi S, Moein M, Nabi A, Narimani N. Effects of microsurgical varicocelectomy on semen analysis and sperm function tests in patients with different grades of varicocele: Role of sperm functional tests in evaluation of treatments outcome. Andrologia. 2018;50(8):e13069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13069
Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, Agarwal R, Short RA, Sabanegh E, et al. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 2007;70(3):532-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.011
Baigorri BF, Dixon RG. Varicocele: A Review. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016;33(3):170-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1586147
Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioglu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2009;30(1):33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.108.005967
Williams DH, Karpman E, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele: surgical techniques in 2005. Can J Urol. 2006;13 Suppl 1:13-7.
Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH, Shokeir AA. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2007;69(3):417-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.057
Al-Said S, Al-Naimi A, Al-Ansari A, Younis N, Shamsodini A, K As, et al. Varicocelectomy for male infertility: a comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches. J Urol. 2008;180(1):266-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.050
Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Farsi HM. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011;59(3):455-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.008
Ghaed MA, Mahmoodi F, Alizadeh HR. Prognostic factors associated with bilateral, microsurgical vasovasostomy success. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2018;23(4):373-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2018.05.006
Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 1992;148(6):1808-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37035-0
Kibar Y, Seckin B, Erduran D. The effects of subinguinal varicocelectomy on Kruger morphology and semen parameters. J Urol. 2002;168(3):1071-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64577-6
Marmar JL, Kim Y. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: a technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data. J Urol. 1994;152(4):1127-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32521-1
Segenreich E, Shmuely H, Singer R, Servadio C. Andrological parameters in patients with varicocele and fertility disorders treated by high ligation of the left spermatic vein. Int J Fertil. 1986;31(3):200-3.
Breznik R, Vlaisavljevic V, Borko E. Treatment of varicocele and male fertility. Arch Androl. 1993;30(3):157-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01485019308987750
Krause W, Muller HH, Schafer H, Weidner W. Does treatment of varicocele improve male fertility? results of the 'Deutsche Varikozelenstudie', a multicentre study of 14 collaborating centres. Andrologia. 2002;34(3):164-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0272.2002.00494.x
Rageth JC, Unger C, DaRugna D, Steffen R, Stucki D, Barone C, et al. Long-term results of varicocelectomy. Urol Int. 1992;48(3):327-31.
Masterson TA, Greer AB, Ramasamy R. Time to improvement in semen parameters after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with severe oligospermia. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(3):E66-E9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5408
Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility. 2014;102(6):1556-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.007
Pilatz A, Altinkilic B, Kohler E, Marconi M, Weidner W. Color Doppler ultrasound imaging in varicoceles: is the venous diameter sufficient for predicting clinical and subclinical varicocele? World J Urol. 2011;29(5):645-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0701-4
Tavalaee M, Bahreinian M, Barekat F, Abbasi H, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm functional characteristics and DNA methylation. Andrologia. 2015;47(8):904-9.
Diegidio P, Jhaveri JK, Ghannam S, Pinkhasov R, Shabsigh R, Fisch H. Review of current varicocelectomy techniques and their outcomes. BJU international. 2011;108(7):1157-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09959.x
Ughi G, Dell'Atti L, Ricci C, Daniele GP. (Micro)surgical and percutaneous procedures in the management of varicocele: 25 years of experience. Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica. 2012;84(2):79-83.
Fukuda T, Miyake H, Enatsu N, Matsushita K, Fujisawa M. Assessment of Time-dependent Changes in Semen Parameters in Infertile Men After Microsurgical Varicocelectomy. Urology. 2015;86(1):48-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.014
Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, Agarwal R, Short RA, Benoff S, et al. Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):639-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.008
Ariagno JI, Mendeluk GR, Furlan MJ, Sardi M, Chenlo P, Curi SM, et al. Computer-aided sperm analysis: a useful tool to evaluate patient's response to varicocelectomy. Asian J Androl. 2017;19(4):449-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.173441
Alargkof V, Kersten L, Stanislavov R, Kamenov Z, Nikolinakos P. Relationships between sperm DNA integrity and bulk semen parameters in Bulgarian patients with varicocele. Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica. 2019;91(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2019.2.125
Zini A, Blumenfeld A, Libman J, Willis J. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm DNA integrity. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(4):1018-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh701
Smit M, Romijn JC, Wildhagen MF, Veldhoven JL, Weber RF, Dohle GR. Decreased sperm DNA fragmentation after surgical varicocelectomy is associated with increased pregnancy rate. J Urol. 2013;189(1 Suppl):S146-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.024
Inci K, Hascicek M, Kara O, Dikmen AV, Gurgan T, Ergen A. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and treated and untreated varicocele. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1500-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.028
Tournaye H. Male factor infertility and ART. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(1):103-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2011.65
Al Bakri A, Lo K, Grober E, Cassidy D, Cardoso JP, Jarvi K. Time for improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. J Urol. 2012;187(1):227-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.041
Nieschlag E, Hertle L, Fischedick A, Abshagen K, Behre HM. Update on treatment of varicocele: counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(8):2147-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.8.2147
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
