https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.3.339

Penile lenghthening original technique using a pubo-cavernous spacer. Long term results from a series of over 200 patients

Vol. 94 No. 3 (2022)
Published: September 26, 2022
Penile lenghthening, penile elongation, pubo-cavernous spacer, small penis, supensory ligament release, Penile augmentation
Abstract Views: 1397
PDF: 766
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Antonio Rossi
Maternal and Infantile and Urologynaecological Sciences Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Giovanni Alei
Department of General Surgery and Plastic Aesthetic Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marco Frisenda
Maternal and Infantile and Urologynaecological Sciences Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Antonio Tufano
Maternal and Infantile and Urologynaecological Sciences Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Pietro Viscuso
Maternal and Infantile and Urologynaecological Sciences Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Guglielmo Mantica
Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Pierluigi Bove
San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Rosario Leonardi
Casa di Cura Musumeci-Gecas, Gravina di Catania (CT), Italy.
Alessandro Calarco
alecalarco@gmail.com
Department of Urology, “Cristo Re” Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Introduction: We report our long experience in the surgical treatment of patients requesting penile lengthening by suspensory ligament release and placement of a custom-made soft silicone pubo-cavernous spacer. The aim was to show that with this surgical technique the results obtained are maintained over time. It is crucial to achieve postoperative satisfaction of these patients who show fragility and self-esteem problems.
Methods: From 1999 to 2020, we treated 245 patients with congenital or acquired penile brevity. We carefully analysed the preoperative and postoperative (at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months) penile size of the patients to evaluate whether this technique could allow the long-term maintenance of aesthetic results. We also assessed preoperative erectile function and we focused on the psychological aspects to avoid surgery in patients with dysmorphophobia. This original technique involves the section of the suspensory ligament and the implantation of a silicone spacer between the pubic symphysis and the corpora cavernosa. This spacer is conformed to the patient anatomy and maintains the relationship between the anatomical structures unchanged over time. Sexual self-esteem and patient satisfaction were assessed with the APPSSI questionnaire.
Results: The mean increase in penile length was about 2.5 cm in flaccid state and 1.9 cm in stretched state. There were no injuries of the neurovascular bundle or urethra, and no erectile dysfunction was noted. These results persisted at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months without significant differences. Over 80% of patients stated that they were completely satisfied with the results obtained. This satisfaction remained stable along follow up.
Conclusion: The section of the suspensory ligament and the implant of the soft silicone spacer provide real penis elongation with satisfactory results that persist over time. This technique avoids the frequent complication of short-term shortening due to the scar adhesions of the edges of the dissected ligament. The high aesthetic satisfaction of patients is stable at controls at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Sharp G, Oates J. Sociocultural influences on men's penis size perceptions and decisions to undergo penile augmentation: a qualitative study. Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39:1253-1259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz154
Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J Urol. 1994; 152:4-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32804-5
Woodhouse CR. The sexual and reproductive consequences of congenital genitourinary anomalies. J Urol. 1994; 152:645-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32673-3
Veale D, Miles S, Read J, et al. Relationship between self-discrepancy and worries about penis size in men with body dysmorphic disorder. Body Image. 2016; 17:48-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.004
Mondaini N, Ponchietti R, Gontero P, et al. Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures. Int J Impot Res. 2002; 14:283-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900887
Spyropoulos E, Christoforidis C, Borousas D, et al. Augmentation phalloplasty surgery for penile dysmorphophobia in young adults: considerations regarding patient selection, outcome evaluation and techniques
applied. Eur Urol. 2005; 48:121-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021
Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, et al. Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men. BJU Int. 2015; 115:978-986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13010
Campbell J, Gillis J. A review of penile elongation surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6:69-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.11.19
Hoznek A, Rahmouni A, Abbou C, et al. The suspensory ligament of the penis: an anatomic and radiologic description. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998; 20:413-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01653133
Li CY, Kayes O, Kell PD, et al. Penile suspensory ligament division for penile augmentation: indications and results. Eur Urol. 2006;49:729-733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.020
Pestana IA, Greenfield JM, Walsh M, et al. Management of "buried" penis in adulthood: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124:1186-1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b5a37f
Protogerou V, Anagnostopolou S, Venierates D, et al. Penis ligaments: their use in "increasing" the size of the penis in penile augmentation procedures. Anatomical description in human cadavers and clinical results of a phalloplasty series. Ann Ital Chir. 2010; 81:199-204.
Alter GJ, Jordan GH. Penile elongation and girth enhancement. AUA Update Series 2007; 26:229-237.
Srinivas BV, Vasan SS, Mohammed S. Penile lengthening procedure with V-Y advancement flap and an interposing silicone sheath: A novel methodology. Indian J Urol. 2012; 28:340-342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.102722
Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML, Kekic ZK, Djakovic NG. Penile surgery and reconstruction. Curr Opin Urol. 2002; 12:191-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00042307-200205000-00002
Goodwin WE, Scott WW. Phalloplasty. J Urol. 1952; 68:903-908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68301-0
Long DC. [Elongation of the penis]. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang wai ke za zhi = Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Waikf [i.e. Waike] Zazhi = Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery and Burns. 1990;6:17-9.
Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW. Complications of penile lengthening and augmentation seen at 1 referral center. J Urol. 1996;155:1617-1620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66144-5
Shaeer O, Shaeer K, el-Sebaie A. Minimizing the losses in penile lengthening: "V-Y half-skin half-fat advancement flap" and "T-closure" combined with severing the suspensory ligament. J Sex Med. 2006;3:155-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00105.x
Vardi Y, Har-Shai Y, Gil T, Gruenwald I. A critical analysis of penile enhancement procedures for patients with normal penile size surgical techniques, success, and complications Eur Urol. 2008;54:1042-1050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.080
Dillon BE, Chama NB, Honig SC. Penile size and penile enlargement surgery: a review. Int J Impot Res. 2008; 20:519-529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2008.14
Mertziotis N, Kozyrakis D, Bogris E. Is V-Y plasty necessary for penile lengthening? Girth enhancement and increased length solely through circumcision: description of a novel technique Asian J Androl. 2013; 15:819-823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2013.58

How to Cite

Rossi, A., Alei, G., Frisenda, M., Tufano, A., Viscuso, P., Mantica, G. ., Bove, P. ., Leonardi, R. ., & Calarco, A. (2022). Penile lenghthening original technique using a pubo-cavernous spacer. Long term results from a series of over 200 patients. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 94(3), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.3.339

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.