https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2020.8410

Evaluation of the marketing methods and handling of live shellfish (American lobsters) for the purpose of sale as food: First evaluations in Piedmont, Italy

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2020)
Submitted: 17 July 2019
Accepted: 10 February 2020
Published: 19 November 2020
Animal welfare, Crustacean Decapods, Homarus americanus
Abstract Views: 680
PDF: 378
HTML: 11
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Daniele Pattono
daniele.pattono@unito.it
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
Elisa D'Agui
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
Marta Fidelio
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
Bartolomeo Griglio
Azienda Sanitaria Locale TO5, Turin, Italy.
Stefano Gili
Azienda Sanitaria Locale TO5, Turin, Italy.
Tiziana Civera
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.

Some species of crustaceans pose problems during marketing, being sold alive. Food Business Operators (FBO) have the need to adopt specific measures based on opinions and guidelines of national and international associations. This investigation was aimed at evaluating the practices in use in the marketing of live crustaceans in Piedmont. Twenty-three plants were analyzed using checklists and through physical and chemical measurements of the water in the holding tanks. The situation appears uneven in the application of Good Handling Practices (GHP), management of animals and knowledge of FBO. Only 48% of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point plans had a dedicated section. Immobilization of the claws was the option identified to control aggressiveness. Dead animals are mainly identified as Category 3 instead of other hygienically safe options. Only 1/3 of interviewed can indicate the slaughtering methods recognized as most suitable for these animals. The aquariums show a good state of maintenance and most of evaluated parameters complaint to GHP except for nitrites (35%). In conclusion, the situation reflects the different levels of knowledge of the FBOs. Therefore the veterinarian of the public health service can propose itself as a reference point for specific training.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Bernardi C, Baggiani L.,Tirloni E., Stella S., Colombo F., Moretti V.M., Cattaneo P, 2015. Hemolimph parameters as physiological biomarkers in American lobate (Homarus americanus) for monitoring the effects of two commercial maintenance methods. Fish Res ; 161: 280-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.08.013
Candotti P, 2007. Sofferenza di Aragoste e Astici vivi con chele legate e su letto di ghiaccio durante la fase di commercializzazione. C.Re.N.B.A. Parere del 29.07.2007; 1-4.
D’Agaro E, Sabbioni V, Messina M, Tibaldi E, Bongiorno T, Tulli F, Lippe G, Fabbro A, Stecchini M, 2014. Effect of confinement and starvation on stress parameters in the American lobsters (Homarus americanus) Ital J Food Sc : 13:3530: 891-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3530
De Fonseca CF, Tamford TLM, Andrade SAC., De Souza EL, Da Silva CGM, 2013. Hygienic-sanitary working practices and implementation of a Hazard Analysis and
Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan in lobster processing industries. Food Sci Technol 33:127-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612013005000019
Esposito G, Nucera D, Meloni D. 2018. Retail stores policies for marketing of lobsters in Sardinia (Italy) as influenced by different practices related to animal welfare and product quality. Foods 7, 103:;doi:10.3390/.
FAO, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016: Opportunities and Challenges. Available from: http://www.fao.org.
Fotedar S and Evans L, 2011. Health management during handling and live transport of crustaceans: A review. J Invertebr Pathol 106:143-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2010.09.011
Fregin T and Bickmeyer U, 2016. Electrophysiological Investigation of Different Methods of Anaesthesia in Lobster and Crayfish. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0162894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162894
Gherardi F, 2009. Behavioral indicators of pain in crustacean decapods. Ann I Super Sanità, 45: 432-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-25712009000400013
Håstein T, Scarfe AD, Lund VL, 2005. Science-based assessment of welfare: aquatic animals. Rev Sci Tech OIE 24:529-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.24.2.1590
Horvath K, Angeletti D, Nascetti G, Carere, 2013. Invertebrate Welfare: an overlooked issue. Ann Ist Super Sanità, 49:9-17.
Jacklin M and Combes J, 2010. The Good Practice Guide to Handling and Storing Live Crustacea. Research and Development, Seafish – Project financed by the European Union trough the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG), the structural found for fisheries.
Liuzzo G, Rossi R, Giacometti F, Mescolini G, Piva S, Serraino A, 2017. Analysis of provincial and municipal regulations Governing crustacean welfare in Italy IJS 6:6228, 54-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2017.6228
Master Fish Merchants Association, 2007. Code of Conduct for the Welfare of Live Seafood, 18 pp; available from https://www.mfma.com.au/industry-issues/code-for-live-seafood
National Aquaculture Council. Aquatic Animal Welfare Guidelines, 2008. Guidelines on welfare of fish and crustacean in aquaculture and/or in live holding systems for human consumption, 45 pp.
Nguyen TT, Barber AR, Corbin K, Zhang W, 2017. Lobster processing by-products as valuable biosource of marine functional ingredients, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals. Bioresour Bioproces 4 (27): 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0157-5
Powell A, Cowing DM, Eriksson SP, Johnson ML 2017. Stress response according to transport protocol in Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus. Crustacean Res 46: 17-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18353/crustacea.46.0_17
RSPCA AU, 2016. Humane killing and processing of crustaceans for human consumption. Available from: www.rspca.org.au
RSPCA UK, 2008. Humane electrical stun/killing of Crustacea; 2008. Available from: www.rspca.org.uk
Simon CJ, Mendo TC, Green BS, Gardner C, 2016. Predicting transport survival of brindle and red rock lobsters Jasus edwardsii using haemolimph biochemistry and behavior traits. Comp Biochem Phys A 201: 101-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.07.001
Tirloni E, Stella S, Gennari M, Colombo F, Bernardi C, 2016. American lobster (Homarus americanus) not surviving during air transport: evaluation of microbial spoilage. IJFS 5:5620: 75-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2016.5620
Weineck K, Ray A J, Fleckstein L J, Nedley M, Dzubuk N, Piana E, Cooper R L, 2018. Physiological Changes as Measure of Crustacean Welfare under Different Standardized Stunning Techniques: Cooling and Electroshock Animals 8,158:1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8090158

How to Cite

1.
Pattono D, D’Agui E, Fidelio M, Griglio B, Gili S, Civera T. Evaluation of the marketing methods and handling of live shellfish (American lobsters) for the purpose of sale as food: First evaluations in Piedmont, Italy. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 19 [cited 2024 Nov. 4];9(3). Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/8410

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.