Phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profile of isolates causing clinical mastitis in dairy animals

Submitted: 2 February 2017
Accepted: 18 April 2017
Published: 3 May 2017
Abstract Views: 2029
PDF: 1008
HTML: 534
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Mastitis is the most frequent and costly disease of lactating animals and is associated with a significant reduction in milk yield, increased cost and culling. Early and specific antibiotic based treatment reduces the severity of the disease. Over the years the extensive use of antimicrobials has led to increase antimicrobial resistance. The present study was designed to investigate the prevalence of microorganisms responsible for mastitis and their antimicrobial resistance pattern. A total of 282 milk samples were collected from different animal species (sheep, cows and goats) with clinical mastitis. Antimicrobial resistance was evaluated for Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. In cow samples Streptococcus spp. represented the most frequently isolated genus (33.84%), while Staphylococcus spp. was the most prevalent genus in sheep and goat samples (44.4 and 73.86%, respectively). Gentamicin and chloramphenicol were found to be the most effective drugs against the tested isolates, while the highest resistance rates were observed for amoxicillin, ampicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

1.
Ceniti C, Britti D, Santoro AML, Musarella R, Ciambrone L, Casalinuovo F, Costanzo N. Phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profile of isolates causing clinical mastitis in dairy animals. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2017 May 3 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];6(2). Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/6612