Analysis of the top-down HoLEP learning curve: A single-center experience of two clinical fellows

Submitted: July 27, 2024
Accepted: September 16, 2024
Published: December 18, 2024
Abstract Views: 2
PDF: 1
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is known to have a steep learning curve. The top-down technique was introduced to lessen the number of procedures required to master HoLEP. We aimed to present the experiences of two successive clinical fellows with the top-down HoLEP learning curve and compare their performance with the supervisor.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 40 patients who underwent top-down HoLEP performed by two successive fellows at our institution from September 2020 to November 2022. Before data collection, each learner observed three top-down HoLEP procedures and assisted with seven additional cases before independently performing top-down HoLEP under supervision. We collected data from each fellow’s first 20 consecutive top-down HoLEP procedures. The learners’ cases were grouped according to chronological order (Cases 1-10 and 11-20). The primary outcome was defined as the number of cases before the fellow could independently complete all steps of top-down HoLEP without any major intraoperative complications. The secondary outcomes included the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of both groups. The fellows’ 40 cumulative cases were then compared against retrospective data from 148 procedures conducted by their supervisor.

Results: There were no significant differences in patient demographics for both clinical fellows. Each learner performed the first 20 cases independently without needing the supervisor to intervene. No major intraoperative complications were recorded, and there were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between fellows’ cases. There was a statistically significant difference between the fellows and their supervisor in terms of operative efficiency and enucleation efficiency (p < 0.001). We did not find a significant difference between the fellows and the supervisor regarding intraoperative complications, major postoperative complications, or postoperative subjective and objective parameters.

Conclusions: Top-down HoLEP shows promising and reproducible results in shortening HoLEP’s learning curve. Larger comparative and multi-institutional studies are warranted.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Elzayat EA, Habib EI, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new "gold standard". Urology 2005; 66(5 Suppl):108-13.
van Rij S, Gilling PJ. In 2013, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) may be the new 'gold standard'. Curr Urol Rep 2012; 13:427-32.
Yin L, Teng J, Huang CJ, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol 2013; 27:604-11.
Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol 2006; 50:563-8.
Ibrahim A, Alharbi M, Elhilali MM, et al. 18 Years of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Single Center Experience. J Urol 2019; 202:795-800.
Robert G, Cornu JN, Fourmarier M, et al. Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int 2016; 117:495-9.
Brunckhorst O, Ahmed K, Nehikhare O, et al. Evaluation of the Learning Curve for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Using Multiple Outcome Measures. Urology 2015; 86:824-9.
Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, et al. Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol 2007; 177:1468-74.
Placer J, Gelabert-Mas A, Vallmanya F, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate: outcome and complications of self-taught learning curve. Urology 2009; 73:1042-8.
Kampantais S, Dimopoulos P, Tasleem A, et al. Assessing the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): A systematic review. Urology. 2018; 120:9-22.
Kim KH, Kim KT, Oh JK, et al. Enucleated weight/enucleation time, is it appropriate for estimating enucleation skills for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? A consideration of energy consumption. World J Mens Health. 2018; 36:79.
Elshal AM, Nabeeh H, Eldemerdash Y, et al. Prospective assessment of learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using a multidimensional approach. J Urol. 2017; 197:1099-107.
Endo F, Shiga Y, Minagawa S, et al. Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2010; 76:1451-1455.
Minagawa S, Okada S, Sakamoto H, et al. En-bloc technique with anteroposterior dissection holmium laser enucleation of the prostate allows a short operative time and acceptable outcomes. Urology. 2015; 86:628-633.
Gong YG, He DL, Wang MZ, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a modified enucleation technique and initial results. J Urol. 2012; 187:1336-1340
Rivera ME, Lingeman JE, Krambeck AE. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol. 2018; 32(Suppl 1):S7-9.
Press B, Ghiraldi E, Kim DD, et al. "En-Bloc" enucleation with early apical release compared to standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A retrospective pilot study during the initial learning curve of a single surgeon. Urology. 2022; 165:275-9.
York NE, Dauw CA, Borofsky MS, et al. V5-08 “TopDown” holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (Holep) technique. J Urol. 2017; 197:e601
Hodhod A, Oquendo F, Tablowski T, et al. 'Top-Down' holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Report of initial cases performed by a single surgeon. Arab J Urol 2020; 19:130-6.
Herrell SD, Smith JA, Jr. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology. 2005; 66(5 Suppl):105-7.
El-Hakim A, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate can be taught: the first learning experience. BJU Int. 2002; 90:863-9.
Seki N, Mochida O, Kinukawa N, et al. Holmium laser enucleation for prostatic adenoma: analysis of learning curve over the course of 70 consecutive cases. J Urol. 2003; 170:1847-50.
Kim SC, Matlaga BR, Kuo RL, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a comparison of efficiency measures at two institutions. J Endourol. 2005; 19:555-8.
Shigemura K, Yamamichi F, Kitagawa K, et al. Does surgeon experience affect operative time, adverse events and continence outcomes in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? A Review of More Than 1,000 Cases. J Urol. 2017; 198:663-70.
Moody JA, Lingeman JE. Holmium laser enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.: comparison to open prostatectomy. J Urol. 2001; 165:459-62
Tunc L, Yalcin S, Kaya E, et al. The "Omega Sign": a novel HoLEP technique that improves continence outcomes after enucleation. World J Urol 2021; 39:135-41
Lerner LB, Tyson MD, Mendoza PJ. Stress incontinence during the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol 2010; 24:1655-8.
Cornwell LB, Smith GE, Paonessa JE. Predictors of Postoperative Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: 12 Months Follow-Up. Urology 2019; 124:213-7.
Elmansy HM, Kotb A, Elhilali MM. Is there a way to predict stress urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? J Urol 2011; 186:1977-81.
Elmansy H, Abbas L, Fathy M, et al. Top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus traditional HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): 1-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; 27:462-8.
Hazem Elmansy, Urology Department, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario

Associate professor, Northern Ontario School of Medicine

How to Cite

Daher, K., Fathy, M., Hodhod, A., Nikoufar , P., Alkandari , A., Abbas, L., Abdul Hadi, R., & Elmansy, H. (2024). Analysis of the top-down HoLEP learning curve: A single-center experience of two clinical fellows. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 96(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12862