https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12450

Surgeon’s point of view in vesico-vaginal fistula management

Vol. 96 No. 2 (2024)
Submitted: March 7, 2024
Accepted: April 6, 2024
Published: June 27, 2024
Vesicovaginal fistula, genitourinary fistula, fistula
Abstract Views: 872
PDF: 259
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Kadek Budi Santosa
busanbsa@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5295-2319
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana; Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Stacia Novia Marta
Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Indonesia.
Ronald Sugianto
Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Fina Widia
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Parsaoran Nababan
Department of Urology, Bhayangkara Anton Soedjarwo Hospital, Pontianak, Indonesia.
Harrina Erlianti Rahardjp
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Objectives: Vesicovaginal fistulas (VVF) are the most commonly acquired fistulas of the urinary tract. The management of VVF is mainly based on expert opinion and surgeon experience. This study aims to provide the practice patterns and outcomes of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) management in Indonesia.

Methods: This study utilizes the results of a survey among the surgeons who performs VVF repair in referral hospitals throughout Indonesia between June and July of 2021. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS descriptively by displaying the relative frequency of the answers to each question of the questionnaire form.

Results: We collected responses from 93 respondents consisting of 68 urologists and 25 gynecologists. The most commonly reported cause of VVF was obstetric (50.5%). Most respondents confirmed the diagnosis of VVF by cystoscopy (81.7%). Waiting time to repair VVF was generally 12 weeks (79.6%), while the transvaginal approach repair was more often performed (77.4%). An additional procedure, such as tissue interposition was performed in 50.5% of cases. Tissue interposition was mostly indicated in recurrent VVF (81%), with omentum being the most selected tissue interposition (71%). When indicated, the most selected method of transabdominal approach was open transvesical (54,84%). A laparoscopic approach was performed only in 7.5% of cases. Overall, the success rate for VVF repair in Indonesia was 70-100% at first attempt.

Conclusions: The transvaginal approach is preferred, either with or without an interposition tissue flap. The success rate at the first attempt is satisfactory.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
El-Azab AS, Abolella HA, Farouk M. Update on vesicovaginal fistula: a systematic review. Arab J Urol. 2019; 17:61-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590033
Haroun A, Ali Mahamat M, Abdel Salam S, Cherif H, Jalloh M, Niang L, et al. The epidemiological, clinical and therapeutical aspects of the vesico-vaginal fistula at the national fistula treatment center in N'apos Djamena. Int J Clin Urol. 2020; 4:34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20200401.18
Rajaian S, Pragatheeswarane M, Panda A. Vesicovaginal fistula: review and recent trends. Indian J Urol. 2019; 35:250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_147_19
Abrams P, de Ridder D, deVries C, Elneil S, Esegbona G, Mourad S, et al. Obstetric fistula in the developing word. ICUD-SIU International consultation, Marrakech, Morocco, October 13-16, 2010.
Lo TS, Chua S, Wijaya T, Kao CC, Uy-Patrimonio MC. Clinical relevance and treatment outcomes of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) after obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 58:111-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.021
Mukti NA, Mochtar AA, Wiyati PS. Kejadian fistula urogenital pada perempuan di RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang. 2018; 7:16.
Harding CK, Lapitan MC, Arlandis S, Bo K, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Costantini E, et al. EAU Guidelines on Management of Non-Neurogenic Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. EAU Guidelines 2023. 2023:91-95.
Adibarata MA, Aditya R, Gumilar KE, Pascawardhana M, Wicaksono B, Ernawati, et al. Bacterial vaginosis in gynecologic outpatient clinic Dr. Soetomo Hospital January - June 2017: A Cross Sectional Study. In Proceedings of the 23rd Regional Conference of Dermatology (RCD 2018), Scitepress 2021, pp 307-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0008156303070311
Goodwin WE, Scardino PT. Vesicovaginal and ureterovaginal fistula: a summary of 25 years of experience. J Urol. 1980; 123: 370-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55941-8
Shrestha DB, Budhathoki P, Karki P, Jha P, Mainali G, Dangal G, et al. Vesico-vaginal fistula in females in 2010-2020: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. 2022; 29:3346-3364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00832-8
Margules AC, Rovner ES. The use of tissue flaps in the management of urinary tract fistulas. Curr Urol Rep. 2019; 20:32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0892-6
Singh V, Mehrotra S, Bansal A, Akhtar A, Sinha RJ. Prospective randomized comparison of repairing vesicovaginal fistula with or without the interposition flap: result from a tertiary care institute in Northern India. Turk J Urol. 2019; 45:377-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.85233
Warner R, Beardmore-Gray A, Pakzad M, Hamid R, Ockrim J, Greenwell T. The cost effectiveness of vaginal versus abdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistula. Int Urogynecology J. 2020; 31:1363-9.
Giannakopoulos S, Arif H, Nastos Z, Liapis A, Kalaitzis C, Touloupidis S. Laparoscopic transvesical vesicovaginal fistula repair with the least invasive way: only three trocars and a limited posterior cystotomy. Asian J Urol. 2020; 7:351-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2019.04.004
Pshak T, Nikolavsky D, Terlecki R, Flynn BJ. Is tissue interposition always necessary in transvaginal repair of benign, recurrent vesicovaginal fistula? Urology. 2013; 82:707-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.076
Breen M, Ingber M. Controversies in the management of vesicovaginal fistula. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 54:61-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.005
Stamatakos M, Sargedi C, Stasinou T, Kontzoglou K. Vesicovaginal Fistula: diagnosis and management. Indian J Surg. 2014; 76:131-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0787-y
Warner R, Beardmore-Gray A, Pakzad M, Hamid R, Ockrim J, Greenwell T. The cost effectiveness of vaginal versus abdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistula. Int Urogynecology J. 2020; 31:1363-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04015-7
Bernard L, Giles A, Fabiano S, Giles S, Hudgins S, Olson A, et al. Predictors of obstetric fistula repair outcomes in Lubango, Angola. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019; 41:1726-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.01.025
Delamou A, Delvaux T, Beavogui AH, Toure A, Kolié D, Sidibé S, et al. Factors associated with the failure of obstetric fistula repair in Guinea: implications for practice. Reprod Health. 2016; 13:135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0248-3
Hilton P. Urogenital fistula in the UK: a personal case series managed over 25 years. BJU Int. 2011; 110:102-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10630.x
Ockrim JL, Greenwell TJ, Foley CL, Wood DN, Shah PJR. A tertiary experience of vesico-vaginal and urethro-vaginal fistula repair: factors predicting success. BJU Int. 2009; 103:1122-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08237.x

How to Cite

Santosa, K. B., Marta, S. N., Sugianto, R., Widia, F., Nababan, P., & Rahardjp, H. E. (2024). Surgeon’s point of view in vesico-vaginal fistula management. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 96(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12450
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.