https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12082

Microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy in treatment of men with primary and secondary infertility (retrospective study)

Vol. 96 No. 1 (2024)
Submitted: November 14, 2023
Accepted: November 28, 2023
Published: February 16, 2024
Varicocele, varicocelectomy, primary infertility, secondary infertility
Abstract Views: 364
PDF: 205
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Shomarufov Azizbek
doctor.shomarufov@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9271-0808
Urology Department of Tashkent Medical Academy; Republican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Urology, Tashkent City, Uzbekistan.

Introduction and objectives: Varicocele is the most common treatable cause of male infertility. The study aimed to compare varicocelectomy efficacy in men with primary (PI) and secondary infertility (SI).
Patients and Methods: Medical records of 100 men suffering from PI and SI and having varicocelectomy at the Republican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Urology were retrospectively selected and analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group I included 58 men with PI and Group II 42 men with SI. Preoperative clinical characteristics and semen parameters before and after varicocelectomy were analyzed and compared between groups.
Results: Analysis revealed that the mean age of patients of group I was significantly lower (p<0.001) and the duration of infertility was accurately shorter (p<0.01) than those of group II. Main semen parameters increased significantly in group I (e.g., sperm concentration increased by 50%, from 62.2 ± 8.7 to 93.5 ± 10.0 M/ml, and total motile sperm count increased by 113%, from 76.7±17.1 to 163.4±27.8 M p<0.05), while in group II only rate of progressive motile sperm increased significantly (by 107%, from 13.5± .6 to 28.0±5.2% p<0.05). We identified a significant difference in varicocelectomy efficacy between group I and group II in change of total motile sperm count (by 113% vs 74% respectively, p<0.01). We also revealed a discrepancy between groups in correlation ratio (r) between initial and post-surgical percent of progressive motile sperm.
Conclusions: Patients with SI were older and had longer infertility period. Varicocelectomy resulted in significant semen parameters improvement in patients with PI. In patients with SI, only a percent of progressively motile sperm improved significantly. It indicates that advanced male age and long infertility duration may have a negative impact on varicocelectomy success.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Capogrosso P, et al. European Association of Urology. Sexual and reproductive health. Arnhem, The Netherlands; EAU, 2023. Available at: uroweb.org/guidelines/sexual-and-reproductive-health
Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 11th ed. Saunders, Elsevier, Philadelphia; 2016. pp. 636-37.
Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, et al. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011; 59:455-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.008
Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role ofvaricocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011; 60:796-808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018
Ficarra V, Cerruto MA, Liguori G, et al. Treatment of varicocele in subfertile men: the Cochrane review—a contrary opinion. Eur Urol. 2006;49:258-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.023
Persad E, O'Loughlin CA, Kaur S, et al. Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;23;CD000479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000479.pub6
Çayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioglu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele review in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2009;30:33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.108.005967
Fukuda T, Miyake H, Enatsu N, et al. Assessment of Timedependent Changes in Semen Parameters in Infertile Men After Microsurgical Varicocelectomy. Urology. 2015;86:48-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.014
Walsh TJ, Wu AK, Croughan MS, Turek PJ. Differences in the clinical characteristics of primarily and secondarily infertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:826-830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.071
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and processing of human semen. 5th edition. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44261
Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Infertility: The 2012 Update. Eur Urol. 2012; 62:324-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.048
World Health Organization. Body Mass Index. 2006. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/body-mass-index
Argawal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, et al. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 2007;70:532-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.011
Samplaski MK, Yu C, Kattan MW, et al. Nomograms for predicting changes in semen parameters in infertile men after varicocele repair. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:68-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.046
Bozhedomov VA, Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomova GE, et al. [Varicocele and reproductive function: pathozoospermia treatment (a prospective comparative study)].[Article in Russian]. Urologiia. 2021;5:62-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2021.2.62-68
Bozhedomov VA, Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomova GE, et al. [Varicocele and reproductive function: epidemiology and infertility risk (the examination of 3632 patients)].[Article in Russian]. Urologiia 2021;3:122-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2021.3.122-128
Gowri V, Venkiteswaran KP, Al-Zakwani I, et al. Comparison of the Demographics, Semen Parameters and Hormone Profiles in Men with Primary and Secondary Infertility. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2010; 10:350-353.

How to Cite

Azizbek, S. (2024). Microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy in treatment of men with primary and secondary infertility (retrospective study). Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 96(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12082
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.