Cover Image

Penile prosthesis surgery in out-patient setting: Effectiveness and costs in the “spending review” era

Nicola Mondaini, Enrico Sarti, Gianluca Giubilei, Andrea Gavazzi, Antonio Costanzi, Arben Belba, Tommaso Cai, Riccardo Bartoletti
  • Nicola Mondaini
    Urology Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital (IOT), Florence, Italy | info@nicolamondaini.it
  • Enrico Sarti
    Urology Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital (IOT), Florence, Italy
  • Gianluca Giubilei
    Urology Unit, Leonardo Da Vinci Hospital, Empoli, Italy
  • Andrea Gavazzi
    Urology Unit, CFO Oncology Center Florence, Italy
  • Antonio Costanzi
    Urology Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital (IOT), Florence, Italy
  • Arben Belba
    Urology Unit, CFO Oncology Center Florence, Italy
  • Tommaso Cai
    Department of Urology, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, Trento, Italy
  • Riccardo Bartoletti
    Urology Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital (IOT), Florence, Italy

Abstract

Introduction: Penile implant patients are required to remain in the hospital after the operation for monitoring, antibiotic and analgesia administration. Cost containment, however, has resulted in the increased use of ambulatory surgery settings for many surgical procedures. Few studies have studied the feasibility of performing penile prosthesis insertion in an outpatient setting. The results are controversial and nowadays, in the most of centers that deal with prosthetic surgery, patients are still hospitalized. Aim: The aim of our investigation was to compare the feasibility of the performance as well as the complication profiles of penile implant surgery performed in an in-patient and an outpatient setting at a single center by a single surgeon. Methods: From January 2009 to June 2014, 50 patients of the same uro-andrological unit underwent penile prosthesis implantation performed by a single surgeon (N.M.). Twenty implantations were performed in an ambulatory day surgery setting. Main outcome measures: Effectiveness and costs of outpatient setting versus the in-patient setting of the penile prosthesis surgery. Results: There were some differences between the two groups in the intra-operative parameters, such as, operating time. Time lost from work was similar in both groups approximating 14 days. The mean number of analgesic pills ingested by the patients post-operatively was similar in both groups, averaging just under 25 pills per patient. There weren’t post-operative complications in the outpatient group. Cost were 17% less in outpatient clinic. Conclusions: The outpatient setting for this surgery is safe and effective even in patients with comorbidities or in case of secondary procedures. Costs are reduced by 17%.

Keywords

Penile prosthesis; Out-Patient; Erectile Dysfunction; Costs; Spending review

Full Text:

PDF
Submitted: 2014-10-10 09:42:11
Published: 2014-09-30 00:00:00
Search for citations in Google Scholar
Related articles: Google Scholar
Abstract views:
822

Views:
PDF
514

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Copyright (c) 2014 Nicola Mondaini, Enrico Sarti, Gianluca Giubilei, Andrea Gavazzi, Antonio Costanzi, Arben Belba, Tommaso Cai, Riccardo Bartoletti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 
© PAGEPress 2008-2018     -     PAGEPress is a registered trademark property of PAGEPress srl, Italy.     -     VAT: IT02125780185