Iatrogenic direct rectal injury: An unusual complication during suprapubic cystostomy (SPC) insertion and its laparoscopic management

Submitted: June 24, 2013
Accepted: June 24, 2013
Published: June 24, 2013
Abstract Views: 2481
PDF: 2387
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Suprapubic cystostomy (SPC) is commonly used, instead of indwelling urethral catheter- ization, as indicated in many pathological conditions. Although considered to be a safe procedure that can be easily performed in an outpatient basis several complications have been reported in international literature. Bowel injury can be a serious complication with the small intestine affected in the majority of cases. We present a case of an acci- dental rectal injury by a suprapubic catheter misplacement, in a 76 year old demented patient with prostatic hyperplasia and chronic urinary retention. The injury was confirmed by cystogra- phy and injection of contrast meterial through the suprapubic catheter, and successfully treated laparoscopically by an extraperitoneal approach. The patient was discharged after 10 days with- out any complications. The above method, in experienced hands, can be an effective primary treatment option for such rare but devastating complications. The case and management is unique as, to our knowledge, as no similar cases have been presented.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Rajmohan, R., Aguilar-Davidov, B., Tokas, T., Rassweiler, J., & Gözen, A. S. (2013). Iatrogenic direct rectal injury: An unusual complication during suprapubic cystostomy (SPC) insertion and its laparoscopic management. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 85(2), 101–103. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2013.2.101