https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2019.7943
Clinical translational students' perceptions of research ethics coursework: a case study
Submitted: 17 November 2018
Accepted: 31 January 2019
Published: 18 April 2019
Accepted: 31 January 2019
Abstract Views: 1168
PDF: 427
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Relatively unknown is whether coursework in responsible conduct of research actually achieve the purposes for which it is designed. In this study, the authors report clinical translational students’ perceptions of their research ethics coursework and the alignment between course content as recommended in the literature. We used grounded theory to portray emergent findings across focus groups and semistructured interviews among 31 participants at one clinical translational science hub. We also used thematic analysis to analyze course syllabi. Two themes emerged: Averting scientific misconduct and Responding to ethical dilemmas. Students reported that they did not acquire requisite strategies to address research ethical dilemmas. One of the course syllabi indicated the provision of active learning opportunities. However, the findings did not offer support. Developing experiential learning activities and ensuring that course content is aligned with the contemporary ethical practices, such as case study and portfolio development, is recommended.
Allen D, Ripley E, Coe A, Clore J. Reorganizing the general clinical research center to improve the clinical and translational research enterprise. Eval Health Professions 2013;36:492-504.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713500302
Clinical and Translational Science Awards. Available from: https://ncats.nih.gov/ctsa. Accessed: January 24, 2019.
Institute of Medicine. The CTSA Program at NIH: opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.
Pincus HA, Abedin Z, Blank AE, Mazmanian PE. Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards: a “top ten” list. Eval Health Professions 2013;36:411-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713507061
Estape E, de Laurido LES, Shaheen M, et al. A multi-institutional, multidisciplinary model for developing and teaching translational research in health disparities. Clin Trans Sci 2011;4:434-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00346.x
Loue S. The impact of a research ethics training program. JERHRE 2014;9:46-55.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614552396
DuBios JM, Schilling DA, Heitman E, et al. Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials. Clin Transl Sci 2010;3:109-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x
Kon AA, Schilling DA, Heitman E, et al. Content analysis of major textbooks and online resources used in responsible conduct of research instruction. AJOB Pri Res 2011;2:42-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.564263
Steneck NH. ORI Introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e639912011-001
Helton-Fauth W, Gaddis B, Scott G, et al. A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work. Acct Res: Pol & Qual Assr 2003;10:205-28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/714906104
Antes AL, Wang X, Mumford MD, et al. Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Acad Med 2010;85:519-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd1cc5
Yarborough M, Hunter L. Teaching research ethics better: focus on excellent science, not bad scientists. Clin Trans Sci 2013;6:201-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12035
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Moral science: protecting participants in human subjects research. Available from: https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/node/558.html Accessed: August 6, 2018.
Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Man Learn Educ 2005;4:193-212.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
Baker AC, Jensen PJ, Kolb DA. Conversational learning: An experiential approach to knowledge creation. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group; 2002.
Dewey J. My pedagogic creed. Curriculum Studies Reader E2. Washington: Routledge; 2013. pp 29-35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017609-9
Mills M. The sociology of small groups. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: FT Press; 2014.
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2006.
Aguinaldo JP. Qualitative analysis in gay men’s health research: comparing thematic, critical discourse, and conversation analysis. J Homosexual 2012;59:765-87.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.694753
Nemec PB, Bussema E. Learning objectives. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2010;33:328-30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2975/33.4.2010.328.330
Bærøe K. Translational ethics: an analytical framework of translational movements between theory and practice and a sketch of a comprehensive approach. BMC Med Ethics 2014;15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-71
Hostiuc S, Moldoveanu A, Dascălu M-I, et al. Translational research – the need of a new bioethics approach. J Trans Med 2016;14:16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-0773-4
Colnerud G. Brief Report: ethical problems in research practice. JERHRE 2013;8:37-41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.37
Domen RE. The ethics of ambiguity. Academic Path 2016;3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289516654712
Strosberg MA, Genefas E, Famenka A. Research ethics review: identifying public policy and program gaps. JERHRE 2014;9:3-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2014.9.2.3
Kagarise MJ, Sheldon MD. Translational ethics: A perspective for new millennium. JAMA Surg 2000;135:39-45.
STREAM research. Available from: http://www.translationalethics.com/ Accessed: August 6, 2018.
KIimmelman J. Ethics, ambiguity aversion, and the review of complex translational clinical trials. Bioethics 2011;26:242-50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01856.x
Kligyte V, Marcy RT, Sevier ST, et al. A qualitative approach to responsible conduct of research (RCR) trining development: identification of metacognitive strategies. Sci Eng Ethics 2008;14:3-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9035-4
Anderson MS, Horn AS, Risbey KR, et al. What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH‐funded scientists. Acad Med 2007;82:853-60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c
Heitman E, Olson CH, Anestidou L, Bulger RE. New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med 2007;82:838-45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7956
Behar-Horenstein LS, Feng X, Isaac C, Lee B. Dental students’ expression of cultural competence. J Ethnograph Qual Res 2017;11:171-87.
Behar-Horenstein LS, Feng X. Enhancing cultural competence among dental students through active teaching and experiential learning. Qual Rep 2017;22:1169-85.
Behar-Horenstein LS, Catalanotto FA, Garvan CW, Hudson-Vassell CN. An assessment of faculty and dental student decision-making in ethics. J Am Coll Dent 2014;81:44-50.
Johnson J, Bagdasarov Z, Connelly S, et al. Case-based ethics education: the impact of cause complexity and outcome favorability on ethicality. JERHRE 2012;7:63-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.63
Rubio DG. Common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research. Eval Health Prof 2013;36:432-46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713499586
Silverman H. Strosberg M, Luna F, et al. An analysis of online courses in research ethics in the Fogarty-sponsored bioethics training programs. JERHRE 2013;8:59-74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.59
Supporting Agencies
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under University of XXX Clinical and Translational Science Awards TL1TR001428, KL2TR001429, and UL1TR001427.How to Cite
Behar-Horenstein, Linda S., and Huibin Zhang. 2019. “Clinical Translational students’ Perceptions of Research Ethics Coursework: A Case Study”. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2019.7943.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.