A view into clinical practice guidelines: who uses them, who doesn’t and possibly, why
Submitted: 15 January 2017
Accepted: 24 April 2017
Published: 21 July 2017
Accepted: 24 April 2017
Abstract Views: 3065
PDF: 973
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
University of Drexel, Philadelphia, PA; Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, United States.
Teva Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Graham, R, Mancher, M, Wolman, D, at al. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/13058
Ament SMC, de Groot JJA, Maessen JMC, et al. Sustainability of professionals’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines in medical care: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2015; 5: 1-13. doi:10.1 36/bmjopen-2015-008073
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008073
Wiltsey S, Kimberly J, Cook N, et al. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 2-17.
Berkwits, M, Inui, ST. Making Use of Qualitative Research Techniques. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 195-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00048.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00048.x
Creswell, JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.
Creswell, JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
Malterud, K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001; 358: 483-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
Moustakas, C. Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Merriam, S. B. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley imprint; 2009.
Cabana, MD, Rand, CS, Powe, NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? JAMA 1999; 282: 1458–64. doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
Saldana, J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2015.
Raghavan, D, Kim, ES. Clinical pathways: Are we training cookbook oncologists? 2016 Jun 1 [cited 2016 July 8]. Available from http://am.asco.org/clinical-pathways-are-we-training-cookbook-oncologists?et_cid=37910128&et_rid=1614915405&linkid=Raghavan
Erickson, BK, Martin, JY, Shah, MM, et al. Reasons for failure to deliver National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-adherent care in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer at an NCCN cancer center. Gynecol Oncol 2014;133:142–6. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.006
Falandry, C, Campone, M, Cartron, G, et al. Trends in G-CSF use in 990 patients after EORTC and ASCO guidelines. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2389–98. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.031
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.031
Link, H, Nietsch, J, Kerkmann, M, Ortner, P. Adherence to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guidelines to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy: A representative sample survey in Germany. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24: 67–6. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2779-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2779-5
Goldberg, SL, Akard, LP, Dugan, MJ, et al. Barriers to physician adherence to evidence-based monitoring guidelines in chronic myelogenous leukemia. JOP 2015; 11: 398–404. doi:10.1200/JOP.2014.001099
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2014.001099
Gnant, M. Guidelines: usefulness and limitations. Breast Care (Basel) 2013; 8: 172-3. doi:10.1159/00035379
Abdelsattar, ZM, Reames, BN, Regenbogen, SE, et al. Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines. Cancer 2015; 121: 783–9. doi:10.1002/cncr.29124
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29124
Lenzer, J, Hoffman, J, Furberg, C, Ioannidis, J. Ensuring the integrity of clinical practice guidelines: A tool for protecting patients. BMJ 2013; 347: 1–10. doi:10.1136/bmj.f5535
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5535
Reames, BN, Krell, RW, Ponto, SN, Wong, SL. Critical evaluation of oncology clinical practice guidelines. JCO 2013; 31: 2563–68. doi:10.1200/JC0.2012.46.8371
Supporting Agencies
NoneHow to Cite
Munteanu, Mihaela C., and Julie Choi Jordan. 2017. “A View into Clinical Practice Guidelines: Who Uses Them, Who doesn’t and Possibly, Why”. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2017.6544.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.