BILATERAL VESICO-URETERAL REFLUX IN PATIENT WITH CROSSED RENAL ECTOPIA AND FUSION TYPE A

Submitted: 16 May 2012
Accepted: 16 May 2012
Published: 16 May 2012
Abstract Views: 1310
PDF: 1029
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Introduction. Crossed renal ectopia with fusion is a very rare congenital anomaly and the reported incidence varies between 1:1000 and 1:7000. The kidney is located on the opposite site of the mid- line from where the ureter enters the bladder. Eighty-five percent of crossed renal ectopia kid- neys are fused from below to the normally located kidney. This anomaly is more frequent for left kidney and it’s associated with vesico-ureteral re- flux (VUR) in 25-70% of cases. We report the management of a six-years-old patient with Pluri- malformative Syndrome, trisomy p16 and mono- somy q2, crossed renal ectopia with fusion type A and bilateral vesico-ureteral reflux (grade IV in the right kidney and grade III in the left).Materials and Methods. A 6-year-old boy was ammitted to our hospital for UTI in plurimalfor- mative syndrome characterized at birth by cleft palate, macrocephaly, congenital clubfeet, twisted right arm, congenital dysplasia of the hip, balanic hypospadias, bilateral inguinal hernia, right renal agenesis and epilepsy tonic-clonic. MRI revealed a fusion of the ectopic kidney with the left ortho- topic kidney (crossed renal ectopia with fusion type A). Voiding cystography showed a dilatated ureter of the crossed ectopic kidney passing across the midline and of the left ureter, and a bilateral vesico-ureteral reflux ( grade IV VUR in the right kidney and grade III VUR in the left). For this reason bilaterally endoscopic subureteral infiltra- tion was performed with Deflux ( 0.3 cc for side). Results. Patient was discharged in third day and he took antibiotic for one week. There weren’t complications like fever, obstruction or UTI. Fol- low-up after 1 month is normal and there weren’t UTI. Conclusion. Generally the outcome of patients with fused crossed renal ectopia is good. Presence of associated pathology likeVUR, could lead to a progressive deterioration of renal function. There- fore, in patient with uninhabited kidney area and UTI, it’s very important a carefull radiological in- vestigation to exclude a renal ectopy complicated by RVU and especially to realize an appropriate treatment strategy before the patient develops a chronic renal failure. Endoscopic infiltration with Deflux, in our case, was detected a viable surgical technique for its minimally invasiveness and also for its efficacy with a relatively short hospital stay.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Bulotta, A., Pavone, M., Di Maggio, G., Burgio, A., Cerchia, E., Giannotti, G., & Messina, M. (2012). BILATERAL VESICO-URETERAL REFLUX IN PATIENT WITH CROSSED RENAL ECTOPIA AND FUSION TYPE A. Journal of the Siena Academy of Sciences, 2(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.4081/jsas.2010.483