Cultivation of hydrocarbon-tolerant microalgae in flowback wastewaters produced during hydrofracking of impermeable rocks

Submitted: June 7, 2022
Accepted: September 3, 2022
Published: September 8, 2022
Abstract Views: 830
PDF: 232
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Huge amounts of Wastewaters (WWs) are produced yearly by the hydrofracking of impermeable rock formations for the extraction of oil or natural gas. Flowback Wastewaters (FWs) are characterized by high contents of inorganic contaminants and hydrocarbons thus representing a relevant threat for the environment. In this work three hydrocarbon-tolerant microalgae have been cultivated in flowback water generated during hydraulic fracturing to investigate their growth kinetics. All three strains could grow in FWs irrespective of the presence of oil hydrocarbons. Biomass productivity varied significantly among the strains. Ochromonas danica achieved a specific growth rate equal to 0.386 day–1 during the exponential phase and a maximum biomass productivity equal to 39 mg L–1 day–1 after 11 days of batch cultivation. Scenedesmus dimorphus was capable to grow in the FWs by achieving a biomass concentration equal to 0.5 g L–1 after about 25 days of cultivation. On the contrary, Prototheca zopfii was strongly affected by the contaminants of FWs. Ultimately, this study demonstrated that specific strains of microalgae could thrive in FWs and thus represent suitable candidates to future research activity aimed to verify the possibility to bio-remediate these harmful WWs.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Mahmud HB, Ermila M, Bennour Z, Mahmud WM. A review of fracturing technologies utilized in shale gas resources. In Eshiet KII, Moghanloo RG, (eds). Emerging technologies in hydraulic fracturing and gas flow modeling. London: IntechOpen; 2020.
Maule AL, Makey CM, Benson EB, et al. Disclosure of hydraulic fluid chemical additives: analysis of regulations. New Solut 2013;23:167-87.
Fajfer J, Lipińska O, Konieczyńska M. Hydraulic fracturing flowback chemical composition diversity as a factor determining possibilities of its management. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2022;29:16152-75.
Estrada JM, Bhamidimarri RA. Review of the issues and treatment options for wastewater from shale gas extraction by hydraulic fracturing. Fuel 2016;182:292-303.
Ellafi A, Jabbari H, Tomomewo OS, et al. Future of hydraulic fracturing in terms of water management and environmental issues: A critical review. Paper presented at the SPE Canada unconventional resources conference, Virtual, Sep. 2020.
Soru S, Malavasi V, Concas A, et al. A novel investigation of the growth and lipid production of the extremophile microalga Coccomyxa melkonianii SCCA 048 under the effect of different cultivation conditions: Experiments and modeling. Chem Eng J 2019;377:120589.
Concas A, Steriti A, Pisu M, Cao G. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the effects of iron on growth and lipid synthesis of microalgae in view of their use to produce biofuels. J Environ Chem Eng 2021;9:105349.
Soru S, Malavasi V, Caboni P, et al. Behavior of the extremophile green alga Coccomyxa melkonianii SCCA 048 in terms of lipids production and morphology at different pH values. Extremophiles 2019;23:79-89.
Lutzu GA, Dunford NT. Growing algae in produced water generated during oil and gas production using hydraulic fracturing technique. Chem Engin Trans 2019b;74:1261-66.
Lutzu GA, Marin MA, Concas A, Dunford NT. Growing Picochlorum oklahomensis in hydraulic fracturing wastewater supplemented with animal wastewater. Wat Air Soil Poll 2020;231:457.
Concas A, Lutzu GA, Dunford NT. Experiments and modeling of Komvophoron sp. growth in hydraulic fracturing wastewater. Chem Eng J 2021;426:131299.
Lutzu GA, Ciurli A, Chiellini C, et al. Latest developments in wastewater treatment and biopolymer production by microalgae. J Environ Chem Eng 2021;9:104926.
Lutzu GA, Dunford NT. Algal treatment of wastewater generated during oil and gas production using hydraulic fracturing technology. Environ Technol 2019a; 40:1027-34.
UTEX, The Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Texas at Austin (UTEX). Accessed 07.09.2022. Available from: https://utex.org/collections/living-algal-strains
Zhou N, Dunford NT. Characterization of green microalgae and cyanobacteria isolated from Great Salt Plains. Trans ASABE 2017;60:283-90.
Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice E, et al. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. Centennial edition, American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA. 2005
Bhola VK, Swalaha FM, Nasr M, et al. Physiological responses of carbon-sequestering microalgae to elevated carbon regimes. Eur J Phycol 2016;51:401-12.
Banks HT, Collins E, Flores K, et al. Statistical error model comparison for logistic growth of green algae (Raphidocelis subcapitata). Appl Math Lett 2017;64:213-22.
Pillard DA, Tietge JE, Evans JM. Estimating the acute toxicity of produced waters to marine organisms using predictive toxicity models. In: Reed M, Johnsen S, (eds). Produced water 2. Environmental science research, Vol. 52, Boston, MA, Springer; 1996. pp 49-59.
Knapik E, Chruszcz-Lipska K, Łukanko Ł, Wysocki S. Reuse of flowback water from hydraulic fracturing for drilling mud preparation and secondary hydrocarbon recovery. Energies 2021;14:5921.

How to Cite

Lutzu, G. A., Concas, A., & Dunford, N. T. . (2022). Cultivation of hydrocarbon-tolerant microalgae in flowback wastewaters produced during hydrofracking of impermeable rocks. Journal of Biological Research - Bollettino Della Società Italiana Di Biologia Sperimentale, 95(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2022.10660