Comment to: Defence’s argument for stripping without high ligation (Plaidoyer pour le stripping sans crossectomie), by Creton D. Phlébologie 2013;66:49-53.
Submitted: 18 April 2014
Accepted: 18 April 2014
Published: 18 April 2014
Accepted: 18 April 2014
Abstract Views: 1298
full Text: 1290
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Stripping without HL was studied in 195 cases with recurrence in 1.8% at two years, and in a randomized trial comparing stripping with (60 cases) and without (60 cases) HL: at 8 years f.u. clinical recurrence was 29% versus 9.8% , while ultrasound showed 32.2% versus 11.4% recurrences.
In the Author’s experience of 8595 cases from 1997 to 2008, the stripping without HL replaced totally the traditional technique since 2005.
Ricci, S. (2014). Comment to: Defence’s argument for stripping without high ligation (Plaidoyer pour le stripping sans crossectomie), by Creton D. Phlébologie 2013;66:49-53. Veins and Lymphatics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/vl.2014.3861
Copyright (c) 2014 Stefano Ricci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.