Comment to: Significant endothelin release in patients treated with foam sclerotherapy, by Frullini A, Barsotti MC, Santoni T, Duranti E, Burchielli S, Di Stefano R. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:741–7.

Submitted: 20 August 2012
Accepted: 20 August 2012
Published: 26 September 2012
Abstract Views: 1083
FULL TEXT: 647
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

A greater incidence of cough, transient visual and neurological disturbances have been reported with foam rather than with liquid sclerosant. These complications have often been associated with migraine and patent foramen ovale (PFO), a common condition affecting approximately 25% of the whole adult population. Foam bubbles may pass through a PFO to the left heart chambers, with consequent paradoxical systemic embolization. Visual and neurological disturbances have often been reported also with liquid sclerosants which conflicts with the bubble theory...

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Ferrara, F. (2012). Comment to: Significant endothelin release in patients treated with foam sclerotherapy, by Frullini A, Barsotti MC, Santoni T, Duranti E, Burchielli S, Di Stefano R. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:741–7. Veins and Lymphatics, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.4081/ByblioLab.2012.6