To heal or not to heal, physician, that is the question


Published: 22 December 2019
Abstract Views: 651
PDF: 445
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Physicians experience mental illness, substance abuse and burnout at comparable to considerably higher rates than the general population. However, they face great risk if they acknowledge on licensing and credentialing application queries the fact of their seeking help or that they have sought such in the past. Physicians also risk allegation of having such disorders, especially by any of three major regulatory powers which have authority over their professional licenses. These entities can mandate so-called Psychological Fitness- For-Duty Evaluations (PFFDE) by non-neutral evaluators and then compel acceptance of their findings and immediate and full compliance with their recommendations, doing so in an environment devoid of due process and with no discernible recourse for the subject physician. This article strives to highlight this previously unrecognized peril and encourage further exploration of these concerns and undertaking of collaborative measures to ensure that physicians can obtain professional help when needed without causing career jeopardy while also honoring the valid quality of care and patient safety concerns of the prevailing regulatory entities.


The Medical Society of New Jersey vs Fred M. Jacobs, MD, JD, and The New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners. Memorandum of The United States As Amicus Curiae. Civ. A. 93 - 3670 (WGB). Oct. 5, 1993 United States District Court, New Jersey. Available from: https://www.ada.gov/briefs/mednjbr.pdf

Wible P, Palermini A. Physician-friendly states for mental health: a review of medical boards. Pamela Wible MD 2019. Available from: https://www.idealmedicalcare.org/physician-friendly-states-for-mental-health-a-review-of-medical-boards/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2019.8649

Goren W. Medical licensing boards, physician health programs, and the lack of ADA compliance: an opportunity for plaintiff lawyers. Understanding the ADA 2019. Available from: https://www.williamgoren.com/blog/2019/07/13/medical-licensing-boards-physician-health-programs-ada-compliance/

Reese S. Is it burnout or depression, and does the solution differ? Medscape 2018. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/903025

Page L. Burnout might really be depression; how do doctors cope? Medscape 2018. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/891005

National Academy of Medicine NAM 2018. Establishing clinician well-being as a national priority in Action collabora-tive on clinician well-being and resilience [Internet] Available from: https://nam.edu/establishing-clinician-well-being-as-a-national-priority/

Dzau V. Collective action needed to stem burnout and restore clinician well-being and resilience. STAT 2018. Available from: https://www.statnews.com/2018/02/15/clinician-physician-burnout-resilience/

Federation of State Physician Health Programs 2019. Physician health program guidelines [Internet]. Available from: https://www.fsphp.org/guidelines.

Emmons R, Manion K, Andrew L. Systematic abuse and misuse of psychiatry in the medical regulatory-therapeutic com-plex. J Am Phys Surg. 2018;23:110-4. Available from: http://www.jpands.org/vol23no4/emmons.pdf

Skipper G, Specht T. State PHPs protect the public - and save careers. Physician Health News. 2013;18:4. [Newsletter]. Available from: https://www.fsphp.org/assets/docs/fsphp_newsletter_2013.pdf

North Carolina General Assembly. General Statutes. Available from: https://www.ncleg.gov/enactedlegislation/statutes/pdf/bysection/chapter_90/gs_90-14.pdf

Federation of State Medical Boards 2018 Guidelines for the structure and function of a state medical and osteopathic board. Available from: http://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/policies/guidelines-for-the-structure-and-function-of-a-state-medical-and-osteopathic-board.pdf

Huntoon L. Sham peer review: violations of due process and fundamental fairness. J Am Phys Surg. 2018;23. Available from: https://www.jpands.org/vol23no3/huntoon.pdf

Huntoon L. Tactics characteristic of sham peer review. J Am Phys Surg. 2009;14. Available from: https://www.jpands.org/vol14no3/huntoon.pdf

DuPont R, Mclellan AT, White WL, et al. Setting the standard for recovery: physicians' health programs. J. Subst. Abuse Treat 2009;36:159-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2008.01.004

American Psychological Association. Professional practice guidelines for occupationally mandated psychological evalua-tions. Available from: http://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/psychological-evaluations.aspx

Office of the State Auditor, State of North Carolina. Performance audit - North Carolina physicians health program 2014. Available from: https://www.auditor.nc.gov/EPSWeb/Reports/Performance/PER-2013-8141.pdf

Gold KJ, Andrew LB, Goldman EB, Schwenk TL. “I would never want to have a mental health diagnosis on my rec-ord”: a survey of female physicians on mental health diagnosis, treatment, and reporting. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2016;43:51-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.09.004

Manion, Kernan Thomas. 2019. “To Heal or Not to Heal, Physician, That Is the Question”. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare 3 (3). https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2019.8665.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations