Physician-Friendly States for Mental Health: A Comparison of Medical Licensing Boards

https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2019.8649
  • Pamela Wible | roxywible@comcast.net Ideal Medical Care, Eugene, OR, United States.
  • Arianna Palermini Medical student, United States.

Abstract

Do medical boards undermine physician mental health by breaching physician confidentiality and privacy? We analyze the initial medical licensing process in each state to determine if qualified applicants who report mental illness experience discrimination. We then identify the most favorable states for physician mental health.

 

Bookmark and Share

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Dimensions

Altmetric

Published
2019-12-22
Info
Issue
Vol 3 No 3 (2019): Special Issue on Physician Mental Health
Section
Special issue on physician mental health
Keywords:
physician mental health, physician suicide, physician depression, medical boards, physician health programs
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 46

  • PDF: 22
How to Cite
Wible, Pamela, and Arianna Palermini. 2019. “Physician-Friendly States for Mental Health: A Comparison of Medical Licensing Boards”. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare 3 (3). https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2019.8649.

Copyright (c) 2019 The Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.