It doesn’t make sense, but we do: framing disease in an online metastatic breast cancer support community

  • Ariane B. Anderson | Department of Communication, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States.


Using Weick’s sensemaking as a conceptual framework to investigate online discussions between members of a Facebook group of metastatic breast cancer patients, and using thematic analysis to examine textual threads between group members, this research examines participants’ framing of cancer survivorship. Participants in peer-to-peer disease support groups, which are not led by medical experts, communicate differently among themselves in order to cope with chronic and terminal illness. Perceptions of survivorship of late stage patients versus early stage patients differ for a variety of reasons, with late stage patients understanding their illness trajectory more often as chronic and declining. This analysis identified three properties of sensemaking used by members to manage their disease: identity, retrospective, and enactment. Results indicate that peer-to-peer online support group communication engenders distinct framing logics that members draw upon for group support as they manage a chronic and terminal disease.

Bookmark and Share


Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.



Original Articles
Metastatic breast cancer, Sensemaking, Online, Identity, Survivor
  • Abstract views: 406

  • PDF: 189
How to Cite
Anderson, Ariane. 2019. “It Doesn’t Make Sense, But We Do: Framing Disease in an Online Metastatic Breast Cancer Support Community”. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare 3 (2).