Are synthetic pheromone captures predictive of parasitoid densities as a kairomonal attracted tool?


Submitted: 2 February 2012
Accepted: 2 February 2012
Published: 30 April 2011
Abstract Views: 1427
PDF: 1069
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Mohamed Hassan Bayoumy Entomology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; Plant Protection Institute of Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary, .
  • Mehmet Bora Kydan Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversity, Agriculture Faculty, Plant Protection Department, Van, Turkey.
  • Ferenc Kozár Plant Protection Institute of Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Abundance of White Peach scale (WPS), Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Targioni-Tozzetti) and San José scale (SJS), Diaspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) adult males and their attracted parasitoids were monitored using pheromone and sticky tape traps in an orchard of Budapest, Hungary, during 2010. In this study, we tried answer on the question raised whether synthetic commercial pheromones of WSP or SJS could work as a kairomonal stimulant and positively attract higher numbers of the specialized parasitoids. Although pheromone traps attracted a wide range of parasitoid species, most of them were accidentally. However, the parasitoid Thomsonisca amathus (Walker) (Hymenoptera: E ncyrtidae) and the parasitoid Encarsia perniciosi (Tower) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) significantly respond to the sex pheromones of WPS and SJS, respectively, suggesting that they may play an important role in host location.

Bayoumy, M. H., Kydan, M. B., & Kozár, F. (2011). Are synthetic pheromone captures predictive of parasitoid densities as a kairomonal attracted tool?. Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research, 43(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.4081/jear.2011.23

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations