Survey on animal welfare in nine hundred and forty three Italian dairy farms


Submitted: 23 February 2016
Accepted: 2 March 2016
Published: 3 March 2016
Abstract Views: 2168
PDF: 950
HTML: 489
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Angelo Peli Department of Veterinary Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy.
  • Marco Pietra Department of Veterinary Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy.
  • Federica Giacometti Department of Veterinary Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy.
  • Antonella Mazzi Veterinary practitioner, Modena, Italy.
  • Gianluca Scacco Department of Veterinary Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy.
  • Andrea Serraino Department of Veterinary Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy.
  • Lorenzo Scagliarini Veterinary Public Health Area, Bologna, Local Health Unit Bologna, Italy.
The final results of a survey on welfare of dairy cows in 7 Italian Regions are presented. The study has been performed on 943 farms in southern and central Italy to highlight critical and strong points concerning animal welfare in dairy systems, by using direct and indirect criteria. To assess animal welfare, a checklist based on 303 parameters has been used; indirect criteria have been organised in 5 general areas concerning Farm management, Farming and housing systems, Environment, Feeding, Health and hygiene; other resource-based criteria were considered in 5 specific areas for the different productive categories (lactating cows, dry cows, pregnant heifers, cows comeback, calves up to 8 weeks and calves between 8 weeks and 6 months); finally, an Indicators section focused on animal based criteria. Parameters have been valued as conforming or not conforming on the basis of the current lesgislation on animal welfare, and in the other cases by the use of a semi-quantitative scale such as poor, satisfactory, good or very good referring to scientific literature and reports by the Animal Health and Animal Welfare panel of the European Food Safety Authority. Among the 249 examined parameters (54 criteria have been valued as descriptive), 15 showed a failure prevalence inferior to 1%; for the remaining parameters, the overall non-compliance prevalence on the whole sample ranged from a maximum of 67% to a minimum of 2%, showing an inverse proportionality correlation with the herd size. One hundred and ten parameters were judged as poor (96) or not in compliance with the rules in force (14) in more than 10% of the examined herds. The most common non-compliance aspects detected in the different areas concern calves management, staff training and prophylaxis programmes; staff training levels were inversely related to failure prevalences in almost all areas. The combination of direct and indirect criteria has allowed to fully embrace recommendations on the use of animal based measures for the assessment of animal welfare, as accepted into the strategic Plan for the EU animal welfare for 2012- 2015.

1.
Peli A, Pietra M, Giacometti F, Mazzi A, Scacco G, Serraino A, Scagliarini L. Survey on animal welfare in nine hundred and forty three Italian dairy farms. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 3 [cited 2024 Mar. 29];5(1). Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/ijfs.2016.5832

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations


Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.