Clinical supervision in oncology: A narrative review

  • Natalie Hession | natalie.hession@slh.ie St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Andrea Habenicht St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland.

Abstract

The aim of this narrative literature review is to (a) review all empirical studies of clinical supervision (CS) in oncology and to (b) highlight some CS practice issues distinctive to cancer care. This review identified empirical studies related to qualified professionals and published in English since 1995 that connected to CS and oncology. A total of 15 studies were identified with the majority as small scale, exploratory and qualitative. Psychologists were predominantly utilised as facilitators of the CS with varied sample sizes ranging from 5-230 participants. The studies were grouped into three main categories; the impact of supervision on staff, impact of supervision on professional care/development and impact of supervision in existential exploration. This review highlighted the positive impact of CS while demonstrating the need for more methodologically sound programmes of research into CS in cancer settings so detailed models of effective supervision can develop and thereby inform practice.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-05-26
Info
Issue
Section
Reviews
Keywords:
Cancer, Supervision, Oncology, Reflect, Psychologist
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 366

  • PDF: 148
  • Supplementary Tables: 80
  • HTML: 24
How to Cite
Hession, N., & Habenicht, A. (2020). Clinical supervision in oncology: A narrative review. Health Psychology Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/hpr.2020.8651