Urological-Geriatric Integrated Diagnostic-Therapeutic Pathway for elderly patients with urologic diseases

Submitted: 19 August 2019
Accepted: 1 October 2019
Published: 4 November 2019
Abstract Views: 706
PDF: 405
HTML: 58
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Aging of population represents a new challenge for physicians who have to deal with the balance of risk and benefit in a population that is poorly represented in clinical trials. Frail patients need individualized treatments because of their high risk of developing complications in the course of therapies. Several studies have reported the effect of frailty on falls, hospitalization and mortality, but only few have focused on surgical patients and frailty is not included in the traditional surgical risk scales. Geriatric surgery patients have a physiologic vulnerability requiring assessment beyond the traditional preoperative evaluation of adults. Although single organ evaluation cannot be ignored in elderly population, recognition of frail patients during preoperative assessment may provide additional insight in predicting poor outcome; thus, aiding preoperative decision-making. We developed a Urological-Geriatric Integrated Diagnostic-Therapeutic Pathway in order to evaluate ≥65 years old patients affected by urogenital pathologies which require major surgery and to early identify frail subject.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Cammalleri, L., Custureri, R., Pomata, M., Bonini, F., Capponi, G., Introini, C., & Pilotto, A. (2019). Urological-Geriatric Integrated Diagnostic-Therapeutic Pathway for elderly patients with urologic diseases. Geriatric Care, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/gc.2019.8501