Automated mechanical chest compression as a bridge to primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Case report

  • Bebiana Faria | bebianafaria@gmail.com Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.
  • Marina Fernandes Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.
  • Silvia Ribeiro Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.
  • António Lourenço Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.

Abstract

In a peripheral hospital without primary percutaneous coronary intervention or mechanical circulatory support, therapeutic options in patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock or refractory cardiopulmonary arrest are very limited. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation complicated by cardiogenic shock and refractory cardiac arrest, transported with ongoing fibrinolysis to another hospital for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiopulmonary resuscitation with automated mechanical chest compression. This case underlines the difficulty in managing these critically ill patients in peripheral hospitals without advanced resources and discusses some therapeutic options, highlighting automated mechanical chest compression as a bridge to a percutaneous revascularization procedure.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nikolaoua N, Arntz HR, Bellou A et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 8. Initial management of acute coronary syndromes. Resuscitation. 2015; 264–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.030

Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal, 2018; 39, 119–177.

Bernoche C, Timerman S, Polastri T et al. Atualização da Diretriz de Ressuscitação Cardiopulmonar e Cuidados Cardiovasculares de Emergência da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia – 2019. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(3):449-663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190203

Böttiger BW, Arntz HR, Chamberlain DA, Bluhmki E, Belmans A, Danays T, et al. Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(25):2651-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070570

Soar J, Nolan J, Böttiger B et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation, 2015; 100–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.016

Lafuente-Lafuente C, Melero-Bascones M. Active chest compressiondecompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep;(9):CD002751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002751.pub3

Truhlár A, Deakinc C, Soar J et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation, 2015; 148–201.

Published
2020-09-04
Info
Issue
Section
Case Reports
Keywords:
Acute coronary syndrome, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, automated mechanical chest compression
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 198

  • PDF: 84
How to Cite
Faria, B., Fernandes, M., Ribeiro, S., & Lourenço, A. (2020). Automated mechanical chest compression as a bridge to primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Case report. Emergency Care Journal, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2020.8636