Reporting for Duty: The duty cycle in Functional Electrical Stimulation research. Part I: Critical commentaries of the literature
Submitted: 2 August 2018
Accepted: 21 September 2018
Published: 7 November 2018
Accepted: 21 September 2018
Abstract Views: 1157
PDF: 630
HTML: 16
HTML: 16
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Similar Articles
- The Editors, Abstracts of the 2016 Spring Padua Muscle Days: Muscle decline in aging and neuromuscular disorders - Mechanisms and countermeasures | Terme Euganee, Padua, Italy, April 13-16, 2016 , European Journal of Translational Myology: Vol. 26 No. 1 (2016)
- Jetsada Arnin, Traisak Yamsa-ard, Preechapawan Triponyuwasin, Yodchanan Wongsawat, Development of practical functional electrical stimulation cycling systems based on an electromyography study of the Cybathlon 2016 , European Journal of Translational Myology: Vol 27, No 4 (2017)
- Matthew J. Taylor, Ché Fornusek, Andrew J. Ruys, The duty cycle in Functional Electrical Stimulation research. Part II: Duty cycle multiplicity and domain reporting , European Journal of Translational Myology: Vol. 28 No. 4 (2018)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.