Outcome and quality of life of patients with augmented bladder or urinary diversion after kidney transplantation


Submitted: August 21, 2020
Accepted: August 29, 2020
Published: December 17, 2020
Abstract Views: 796
PDF: 468
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Giulia Pozza Department of Surgery, Renal and Pancreas Transplant Unit, University of Padua, Italy.
  • Massimo Iafrate Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Italy.
  • Mariangela Mancini Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Italy.
  • Cristina Silvestre Department of Surgery, Renal and Pancreas Transplant Unit, University of Padua, Italy.
  • Francesca Neri Department of Surgery, Renal and Pancreas Transplant Unit, University of Padua, Italy.
  • Lucrezia Furian Department of Surgery, Renal and Pancreas Transplant Unit, University of Padua, Italy.
  • Paolo Rigotti Department of Surgery, Renal and Pancreas Transplant Unit, University of Padua, Italy.
  • Tommaso Prayer Galetti Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Italy.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess results and quality of life after kidney transplant in adult patients with previously bladder augmentation or urinary diversion due to significant lower urinary tract dysfunction.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study examines the outcome of 19 renal allografts transplanted in patients with augmented bladder or urinary diversion over a ten years period; moreover we submitted SF36 questionnaire to evaluate quality of life of these patients and compared the results with the general population.
Result: Between January 1, 2005 and 31 December 2015 we performed 19/1093 renal transplantations in patients with abnormal lower urinary tract previously treated with bladder augmentation or bladder recycling. Current post-transplant follow-up was 47 months (range 18-188). No patient developed any episode of acute or chronic rejection. Mean serum creatinine after one year from transplant was 102 umol/L. Overall survival is 94.8% at the end of follow-up and graft survival is 89.6%. No significant differences emerged between patients undergoing transplant with lower urinary tract dysfunction and patients without, regarding to recurrent urinary tract infection. There was not statistically significant difference for vitality (p = 0.8088) and mental health (p = 0.8668).
Conclusions: Presence of a previously augmented bladder or other lower urinary tract dysfunction treated in kidney transplant patients doesn’t worsen the final outcome. Mental health and the vitality of these patients are similar to the general population.


Pozza, G., Iafrate, M., Mancini, M., Silvestre, C., Neri, F., Furian, L., Rigotti, P., & Prayer Galetti, T. . (2020). Outcome and quality of life of patients with augmented bladder or urinary diversion after kidney transplantation. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 92(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.4.286

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations