Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis


Submitted: March 2, 2020
Accepted: March 16, 2020
Published: October 1, 2020
Abstract Views: 1538
PDF: 707
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Giorgio Gentile Andrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
  • Ardigò Martino Institute for Integrated Health, Federal University of Mato Grosso Do Sul, Campo Grande MS, Brazil.
  • Daniela Nadalin Health Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of Bologna, Italy.
  • Martina Masetti Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Italy.
  • Brigida Lilia Marta Department of Anthropology, Medical Anthropology Research Center, Rovira I Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain.
  • Franco Palmisano Andrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-9033
  • Alessandro Franceschelli Andrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
  • Patrizia Stella Health Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of Bologna, Italy.
  • Anna Paola Sanfelici Health Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of Bologna, Italy.
  • Eugenio Brunocilla Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Italy.
  • Fulvio Colombo Andrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.

This study is aimed to compare outcomes of penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty to inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra as a singlecentre experience. Data regarding vaginoplasty performed between May 2003 and January 2014 were reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: perineal- scrotal flap vaginoplasty (Group A), and inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra vaginoplasty (Group B). All patients underwent to psychological analysis before surgery. Functional follow-up was based on a modified validated Female Sexual Function Index. Overall, 67 patients with a mean (SD) age of 34 (±9.38) years underwent to surgery. 41 patients were included into the Group A and 26 into the Group B. Mean operative time among Groups A and B was 316 (±101.65) and 594 (±89.06) minutes, respectively (p<0.0001). Longer postoperative hospitalization was shown in Group B (14 days ± 4,51) than in Group A (10 days ± 2,49); (p<0.0001). Group B patients showed a higher anemization rate requiring blood transfusion (p=0.00014) as well as compressive neuropathy (p=0.038). In addition to this, necrosis of the skin flap was reported in 8 patients of Group B (p<0.0001). Comprehensive functional follow-up data was included; spontaneous vaginal lubrication was not reported in 82.4% of Group A vs 12.5% cases of Group B (p=0.0085). When compared to penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty, inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra technique shows an increased risk of complications with comparable satisfaction rates whereas a higher spontaneous vaginal lubrication is reported. Sexological support is of utmost importance in this setting.


Gentile, G., Martino, A., Nadalin, D., Masetti, M., Marta, B. L., Palmisano, F., Franceschelli, A., Stella, P., Sanfelici, A. P., Brunocilla, E., & Colombo, F. (2020). Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 92(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.3.186

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations