Prepuce-sparing corporoplasty as a safe alternative for patients with acquired penile curvature


Submitted: February 23, 2020
Accepted: April 2, 2020
Published: October 1, 2020
Abstract Views: 806
PDF: 475
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Aldo Franco De Rose Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Italy.
  • Francesca Ambrosini Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Italy.
  • Guglielmo Mantica Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Italy.
  • Enrico Zero Department of Computer Science, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy.
  • Riccardo Banchero Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Italy.
  • Carlo Terrone Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Italy.

Objectives: penile curvature is a rare condition, classified as congenital or acquired (Peyronie’s disease) (PD). Surgical correction is the standard treatment. It’s common practice to associate circumcision with penile de-gloving to prevent complications. In this paper we evaluate the feasibility of penile surgery avoiding circumcision.
Materials and methods: patients presenting with penile curvature were treated using a modified Nesbit procedure. Patients were divided into group A if they opted for a prepuce-sparing surgery and the others into group B. Patients were evaluated pre and postoperatively and postoperative complications were assessed. The 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was administered before and 6 months after surgery and we compared the difference of mean value using T-Test.
Results: Group A and B were made of 53 and 16 patients respectively. Median age was 59 years [interquartile range (IQR) 12] in A and 62 (IQR 9) in B (p = 0.2). Median curvature was 40° (IQR 40°) in A and 40 ° (IQR 30°) in B (p = 0.62). Mean difference between pre- and post-operative IEFF was 1.9 ± 2 in A and 2.6 ± 2.1 in B (p = 0.36).
Conclusions: According to our experience, surgical correction of penile curvature without performing circumcision could be a safe and feasible strategy. We recommend performing circumcision only in patients who present with pre-operative phimosis.


De Rose, A. F., Ambrosini, F., Mantica, G., Zero, E., Banchero, R., & Terrone, C. (2020). Prepuce-sparing corporoplasty as a safe alternative for patients with acquired penile curvature. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 92(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.3.182

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations