Effect of body mass and physical activity at younger age on the risk of prostatic enlargement and erectile dysfunction: Results from the 2018 #Controllati survey


Submitted: April 10, 2019
Accepted: May 1, 2019
Published: January 14, 2020
Abstract Views: 1085
PDF: 501
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Fabio Parazzini Università degli Studi di Milano Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, IRCCS Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
  • Walter Artibani Società Italiana di Urologia (SIU), Roma, Italy.
  • Giuseppe Carrieri Dipartimento Nefro/Urologico Clinica Urologica e Centro Trapianti di Rene, Università degli Studi di Foggia, Italy.
  • Luca Carmignani Università degli Studi di Milano, Unità Operativa Complessa, Ospedale Policlinico San Donato, Milano, Italy.
  • Salvatore Voce Divisione di Urologia Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy.

Objective: Overweight and low physical activity (PA) increase the risk of prostatic enlargement and erectile dysfunction (ED). Less clear is the role of these factors at young age on the lifelong risk.
Materials and methods: During June 2018 the Italian Society of Urologists organized the month of Male Urologic Prevention “#Controllati”. Men aged 18 years or more were invited to attend urologic centers for a visit and counselling about urologic/ andrologic conditions. Each participating man underwent a physical examination and was asked about urologic symptoms, sexual activity and possible related problems.
Results: We analyzed data from 2786 men, aged 55.1 years (SD 10.9, range 19-97). A total of 710 (25.5%) subjects had a diagnosis of prostatic enlargement and 632 (22.7%) of DE. Overweight/obese men were at increased risk of prostatic enlargement and ED with corresponding odds ratio (0R) in comparison with normal or underweight men, being respectively 1.18 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.00-1.44) and 1.69 (95% CI 1.39-2.05). The OR of prostatic enlargement in comparison with men reporting at age 25 a BMI < 25.0 was 1.22 (95% CI 1.01-1.51) for men with a BMI at 25 years of age ≥ 25; the corresponding OR value for ED was 1.17 (0.92- 1.48). Considering total PA at diagnosis, the OR of prostatic enlargement in comparison with no or low PA, was 0.69 (95%CI 0.55-0.86) for men reporting moderate PA and 0.75 (95%CI 0.58-0.98) for those reporting intense PA. When we considered PA at 25 years of age, the OR of subsequent diagnosis of prostatic enlargement, in comparison with men reporting no/low PA at 25 years of age was 0.81 (95%CI 0.63-1.04) for men reporting moderate PA and 0.70 (95%CI 0.52-0.99) for those reporting intense PA.
Conclusions: These findings underline the utility of encouraging healthy lifestyle habits among young men in order to reduce the subsequent risk of prostatic enlargement and ED.


Parazzini, F., Artibani, W., Carrieri, G., Carmignani, L., & Voce, S. (2020). Effect of body mass and physical activity at younger age on the risk of prostatic enlargement and erectile dysfunction: Results from the 2018 #Controllati survey. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 91(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2019.4.245

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations