The correlation between biological activity and diffusion-weighted MR imaging and ADC value in cases with prostate cancer


Submitted: July 17, 2017
Accepted: September 23, 2017
Published: December 31, 2017
Abstract Views: 1253
PDF: 522
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Bedriye Koyuncu Sokmen Department of Radiology, Sisli Florence Nightingale Hospital Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Dogukan Sokmen Department of Urology, Hospital Derindere, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Nese Ucar Department of Radiology, Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Huseyin Ozkurt Department of Radiology, Istanbul Hamidiye Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Abdulmuttalip Simsek Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Purpose: Firstly, we aimed to investigate the correlation among dynamic contrasted magnetic resonance (MR) images, diffusion-weighted MR images, and apparent diffusion coefficent (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer. Secondly, we aimed to investigate the roles of these variables on clinical risk classification and the biological behavior of the prostate cancer. Methods: A total of sixty with prostatic adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed between January 2011 and May 2013 were retrospectively included in the study. Risk classification of patients were evaluated as low-risk (Group 1) (n = 20) (Stage T1c-T2a, PSA < 10 ng/ml, Gleason Score < 7), moderate-risk (Group 2) (n = 18) (Stage T1b-T2c, PSA = 10-20 ng/ml, Gleason Score = 7) and high-risk (Group 3) (n = 22) (Stage > T3a, PSA > 20 ng/ml, Gleason Score > 7). Diffusion-weighted MR images, dynamic contrasted MR images, and ADC values of the prostates were correlated. Results: ADC values of the cases in Group 3 were lower than those of the other groups (p < 0.001). ADC values of the areas without malignancy did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). Biological activity of the tumor tissue was determined by GS, while a negative correlation was observed between GSs and ADC values of the patients, (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In tumors with higher Gleason scores, lower ADC values were obtained. These measured values can play a role in the noninvasive determination of the cellularity of the tumoral mass.

Sokmen, B. K., Sokmen, D., Ucar, N., Ozkurt, H., & Simsek, A. (2017). The correlation between biological activity and diffusion-weighted MR imaging and ADC value in cases with prostate cancer. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 89(4), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2017.4.277

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations