Day case laparoscopic radical prostatectomy


Submitted: May 16, 2017
Accepted: June 2, 2017
Published: October 3, 2017
Abstract Views: 1861
PDF: 816
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Hamid Abboudi Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Patrick Doyle Department of Anaesthesia, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Mathias Winkler Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Background: To evaluate the feasibility of performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) as a day case procedure while maintaining patient satisfaction and safety. Herein we report our experience, selection criteria, and discharge criteria for day case LRP. Methods: We performed a prospective study with 32 patients undergoing extraperitoneal LRP. These patients were counselled before the procedure that they would go home the same evening of the procedure. Pain scores and quality of life data were recorded day 1 postoperatively via a telephone consultation. The patients underwent routine blood tests on day 2 and an outpatient review on day 7 and regularly thereafter via an assigned key worker. Socio-demographic data, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected for analysis. Results: All patients were successfully discharged the same day of surgery. Mean patient age was 62 years with a mean body mass index of 25. Mean operative time was 147 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 101 ml. Three patients were treated for post operative urinary tract infections; two patients developed infected lymphoceles which required percutaneous drainage and one patient required re-catheterisation due to a burst catheter balloon. Of these six complications four patients required re-admission. Post-operative pain, nausea and vomiting were low whilst patient satisfaction scores were unanimously high in all patients surveyed. Conclusions: The early experience with extraperitoneal LRP as a same day surgery is promising although patients who are at high risk of lymphocele should be excluded. Preoperative patient counselling and selection is paramount. Patient satisfaction is not adversely affected by the shortened stay. Surgeon experience, a well-motivated patient, meticulous attention to detail through an integrated pathway, a multidisciplinary team and adequate postoperative assessment are essential.

Hamid Abboudi, Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
Specialist Registrar Urology
Patrick Doyle, Department of Anaesthesia, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
Department of Anaesthesia
Mathias Winkler, Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
Consultant Urological Surgeon

Supporting Agencies

nil

Abboudi, H., Doyle, P., & Winkler, M. (2017). Day case laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 89(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2017.3.182

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations