Effectiveness on urinary symptoms and erectile function of Prostamev Plus® vs only extract Serenoa repens


Submitted: April 1, 2015
Accepted: April 1, 2015
Published: March 31, 2015
Abstract Views: 3207
PDF: 1671
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Prostatic inflammation is widespread in the male population. Two groups of 50 patients each with symptoms of prostatic inflammation and ecocolorDoppler indicative of prostatitis were identified. Both groups were further subdivided into two subgroups (respectively A1, A2, B1, and B2). Group A1 underwent therapy with oral levofloxacin 500 mg daily for 10 days plus co-treatment with oral Serenoa repens (320 mg) plus Bromeline plus Nettle (Prostamev Plus®) daily for two months; Group A2 with oral levofloxacin 500 mg daily for 10 days plus oral Serenoa repens extract 320 mg/day for two months; Group B1 specific antibiotic treatment for 10 days (included levofloxacin if sensitive) plus co-treatment with oral Serenoa repens (320 mg) plus Bromeline plus Nettle (Prostamev Plus®) daily for two months; Group B2 with specific antibiotic treatment for 10 days plus Serenoa repens 320 mg/day for two months. The groups treated with Prostamev Plus® in comparison to the groups treated with Serenoa repens extract (saw palmetto) achieved better improvements of both IPSS score, urinary flow and sexual life.

Marzano, R., Dinelli, N., Ales, V., & Bertozzi, M. A. (2015). Effectiveness on urinary symptoms and erectile function of Prostamev Plus® vs only extract Serenoa repens. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 87(1), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2015.1.25

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations