Biopsy follow-up in patients with isolated atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) in prostate biopsy

  • Luca Leone Institute of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Vito Lacetera Institute of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Rodolfo Montironi Institute of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Ubaldo Cantoro Institute of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Alessandro Conti Institute of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Giulia Sbrollini Institute of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Luigi Quaresima Institute of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Luciana Mariani Institute of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Giovanni Muzzonigro Institute of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
  • Andrea Benedetto Galosi | galosiab@yahoo.it Division of Urology, “Augusto Murri” General Hospital, ASUR Marche, Fermo, Italy.

Abstract

The incidence of prostate cancer (PCA) was evaluated in 155 patients with isolated Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) found on initial prostate biopsy, after a medium-term follow-up (40 months) with at least one re-biopsy. Clinical and histological data were analysed. Cancer was detected in 81 of 155 (52.3%). The cancer detection rate was 71.6%, 91.3%, 97.5%, 100% at the 1st re-biopsy, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rebiopsy respectively. At the uni- and multivariate analyses, prostate volume (≤ 30 cc), transition zone volume (≤ 10 cc), small core length at the initial biopsy (≤ 10 mm) and few number of cores at initial biopsy (≤ 8) are predictive of cancer. Furthermore, tumour characteristics on the whole surgical specimens was assessed in 30 men: 13 of 30 (43 %) had clinically relevant cancer (volume > 0.5 ml or/and Gleason score ≥ 7, or pT3). Most of relevant cancers were detected in the distal apex, anterior gland and midline. These anatomical sites could be under-sampled at the initial biopsy using the transrectal approach. Our data suggest that follow-up biopsy is recommended in all cases of isolated ASAP detected after biopsy using endfire transrectal probe. The re-biopsy strategy should increase the number of cores (or a saturation biopsy), focusing on area of ASAP in the initial biopsy, but also including the under-sampled areas (anterior gland, distal apex and midline) to detect clinically relevant cancers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PUBLICATION METRICS

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Dimensions

Altmetric

Published
2014-12-30
Info
Issue
Section
Original Papers - Prostate
Keywords:
Atypical small acinar proliferation, Prostate neoplasms, Biopsy, Diagnosis, Radical prostatectomy
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 1979

  • PDF: 969
How to Cite
Leone, L., Lacetera, V., Montironi, R., Cantoro, U., Conti, A., Sbrollini, G., Quaresima, L., Mariani, L., Muzzonigro, G., & Galosi, A. (2014). Biopsy follow-up in patients with isolated atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) in prostate biopsy. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 86(4), 332-335. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2014.4.332

Most read articles by the same author(s)