https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.2.237
0
0
0
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Does two-piece PPI provide improvement in patient-partner quality of life?

Authors

Engin Özbay
enozbay63@gmail.com
SBU Istanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Research and Training Hospital, Department of Urology, Turkey.
Remzi Salar
SBU Sanlıurfa Mehmet Akif I˙nan Research and Training Hospital, Department of Urology, Turkey.
Halil Ferat Oncel
SBU Sanlıurfa Mehmet Akif I˙nan Research and Training Hospital, Department of Urology, Turkey.

Objective: The aim of this study is to retrospectively examine patient-partner satisfaction and changes in quality of life due to two-piece penile prosthesis implantation (PPI). There is no data about partner Quality of Life (QoL) related to two-piece PPI in the literature.
Material and Methods: SF 36 scale and modified Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), which were filled before two-piece PPI and at the sixth postoperative month follow-up by male patients (n = 45) and female partners (n = 45), were evaluated.
Results: We found patient-partner satisfaction rates as 80% and 86% respectively. The changes in all mean scores of SF 36 (mean total score, mean physical health score and mean mental health score) were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Again, the differences between all mean scores of SF 36 according to the level of patient-partner satisfaction were statistically significant (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Two-piece PPI is an important option for ED treatment. It provides significant improvement in patient-partner QoL with high treatment satisfaction.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 2
  • Captures
    • Readers: 9
see details

Downloads

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Hatzimourotidis K, Guiliano F, Moncada I, et al. EAU guidelines on males sexual dysfunction. 2016; p: 14-22.
Gümüs¸ BH, Albaz AC. Erektil disfonksiyon tedavisinde penil protez implantasyonun uzun dönem klinik sonuçları. Androl Bul. 2017; 19:117-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24898/tandro.2017.54771
Efesoy O, Özbay E, Tek M, et al. Longterm outcomes and couple’s satisfaction with three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Türkiye klinikleri J MedSci, 2010; 30:1965-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2009-14125
Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability andsafety of and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penileprosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol. 2001; 166: 932-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65867-3
Barton GJ, Carlos EC, Lentz AC. Sexual quality of life and satisfaction with penile prosthesis. Sex Med Rev. 2019; 7:178-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.10.003
Newman SP. Psychosocial measures in musculoskeletal trials. J Rheumatol. 1997; 24:979-84.
Ure I, Ozen A, Can C. Life quality change after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Aging Male. 2020; 23:362-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2018.1487393
Chierigo F, Capogrosso P, Dehò F, et al. Long-term follow-up after penile prosthesis implantation-survival and quality of life outcomes. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1827-1833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001
Morey AF. Re: Ambicor 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: who and how? J Urol. 2018; 200:691-692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.044
Ozan T, Karakeçi A, Pirinçci A, et al. Iki parçalı sisirilebilir penil protez cerrahisine ait klinik sonuçlar ve hasta memnuniyetinin degerlendirilmesi. F.Ü.Sag.Bil.Tıp.Derg. 2018; 32:27-30.
Usta MF. Penil protez cerrahisinde yenilikler: 2016 güncelleme. Androloji bülteni. 2016; 18 :212-216.
Esengen S, Nalbant I, Öztürk U, et al. Comparison of penile prosthesis methods: which is more successful? J Clin Anal Med. 2017; 8:421-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.4922
Küçük E, Bindayı A. Penil protez cerrahisi komplikasyonları ve basaçıkma yöntemleri. And Bült. 2016; 18:25-29.
Zacharakis E, Garaffa G, Raheem A et al. Penile prosthes insertion in patients with refractory ischaemic priapism: early vs delayed implantation. BJU Int 2014; 114:576-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12686
Barrett-Harlow B, Clavell-Hernandez J, Wang R. New developments in surgical treatment for penile size preservation in Peyronie’s disease. Sex Med Rev. 2019; 7:156-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.07.001
Mulcahy JJ. Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections. Ther Adv Urol. 2010; 2:69-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287210370330
Mellon MJ, Broghammer JR, Henry GD. The Mulcahy Salvage: Past and Present Innovations. J Sex Med. 2015; 12 (Suppl 7):432-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12986
Salama N. Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among the couples from the Middle East- is it different from that reported elsewhere ? Int J Impo Res. 2004; 16:175-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901150
Özbay E, Aydın A, Salar R, et al. Sexual experiences between partners after penile prosthesis: Who is more satisfied? Andrologia. 2020; 52:e13461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13461
Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2007; 177:262-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.094
Çayan S, Ascı R, Efesoy O, et al. Comparison of long-term results and couples’s satisfaction with penile implant types and brands: lessons learned from 883 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2019; 16:1092-1099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.013
Carvalheira A, Santana R, Pereira NM. Why are men satisfied or dissatisfied with penile implants? A mixed method study on satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2015; 12:2474-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.13054
Caraceni E, Utizi L. Questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP). To what extent does the implant affect the patient’s life? J Sex Med 2014; 11:1005-1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12453
Buster JE. Managing female sexual dysfunction. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100:905-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.026
Tutoglu A, Boyaci A, Koca I, et al. Quality of life, depression, and sexual dysfunction in spouses of female patients with fibromyalgia. Rheumatol Int. 2014; 34:1079-1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-2944-z
Bilgic D, Gokyildiz S, Kizilkaya Beji N, et al. Quality of life and sexual functıon in obese women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Women Health. 2019; 59:101-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2018.1492497
Radoja I, Degmecic D. Quality of life and female sexual dysfunction in Croatian women with stress-, urgency- and mixed urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55:240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55060240
Nappi RE, Cucinella L, Martella S, et al. Female sexual dysfunction (FSD): prevalence and impact on quality of life (QoL). Maturitas. 2016; 94:87-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.09.013
Basson R. Female sexual dysfunction in hypopituitarism. Lancet. 2007; 70(9589):737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61368-3
Basson R. Sexuality in chronic illness: no longer ignored. Lancet. 2007; 369(9559):350-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60166-4

How to Cite

Özbay, E., Salar, R., & Oncel, H. F. (2021). Does two-piece PPI provide improvement in patient-partner quality of life?. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 93(2), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.2.237

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.