Feasibility of local anaesthesia for varicocele correction in one-day-surgery setting. A single center experience

Submitted: July 2, 2020
Accepted: October 15, 2020
Published: June 29, 2021
Abstract Views: 1210
PDF: 429
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Objective: In this study, we compared postoperative outcomes of patients submitted to varicocele correction under general or local anesthesia at a single center.
Methods: All patients underwent varicocele surgical treatment with the Colpi-modified Marmar subinguinal technique. They were managed with either general (Group A) or local with ileo-inguinal and ileo-hypogastric nerves block (Group B) anesthesia. The two groups were compared in terms of timing of discharge and post-operative pain as assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS) at both rest and movement (NRSm). §
Results: Overall, 63 patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 25 years ± 5 yrs. The NRS mean score was significantly lower for Group B during the first 4 days after surgery at both rest and movement (all p < 0.05). Patients receiving local anesthesia showed a faster time to first urination (210 vs. 240 min; p = 0.02), although the time to discharge was comparable between the two groups (250 vs. 250 min).
Conclusions: These results suggest that local anetshesia for varicocele surgical treatment is feasible and provide better pain control and faster recovery after surgery.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Dubin L, Amelar RD. Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1971; 22:469-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)38400-X
Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7:59-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.1.59
Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, et al. EAU Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2020.
Miyaoka R, Esteves SC. A critical appraisal on the role of varicocele in male infertility. Adv Urol. 2012; 2012:597495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/597495
Dabaja AA, Goldstein M. When is a varicocele repair indicated: the dilemma of hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction? Asian J Androl. 2016; 18:213-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.169560
Marmar JL. The evolution and refinements of varicocele surgery. Asian J Androl. 2016; 18:171-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.170866
Ficarra V, Crestani A, Novara G, Mirone V. Varicocele repair for infertility: what is the evidence? Curr Opin Urol. 2012; 22:489-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e328358e115
Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011; 60:796-808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018
Colpi GM, Carmignani L, Nerva F, et al. Surgical treatment of varicocele by a subinguinal approach combined with antegrade intraoperative sclerotherapy of venous vessels. BJU Int. 2006; 97:142-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05915.x
Marmar JL, Kim Y. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: a technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data. J Urol. 1994; 152:1127-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32521-1
Tauber R, Johnsen N. Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele: technique and late results. J Urol. 1994; 151:386-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34956-X
Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, et al. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016; 116:241-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev413
Jensen CFS, Østergren P, Dupree JM, et al. Varicocele and male infertility. Nat Rev Urol. 2017; 14:523-533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.98
Colpi GM, Carmignani L, Bozzini G, Picozzi S. Surgical subinguinal approach to varicocele combined with antegrade intraoperative sclerosis of venous vessels. Surg Innov. 2012; 19:252-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350611429026
Rivat C, Bollag L, Richebé P. Mechanisms of regional anaesthesia protection against hyperalgesia and pain chronicization. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013; 26:621-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aco.0000432511.08070.de
Nordin P, Hernell H, Unosson M, et al. Type of anaesthesia and patient acceptance in groin hernia repair: a multicentre randomised trial. Hernia. 2004; 8:220-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0234-5
Kadihasanoglu M, Karaguzel E, Kacar CK, et al. Local or spinal anesthesia in subinguinal varicocelectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Urology. 2012; 80:9-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.052
Alom M, Ziegelmann M, Savage J, et al. Office-based andrology and male infertility procedures-a cost-effective alternative. Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6:761-772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.34

How to Cite

Saredi, G., Scroppo, F. I., Capogrosso, P., Pirola, G. M., Capone, L., Pacchetti, A., Gianesini, G., Maggio, P., Carcano, G., & Dehò, F. (2021). Feasibility of local anaesthesia for varicocele correction in one-day-surgery setting. A single center experience. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 93(2), 233–236. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.2.233