Exploratory study of factors influencing fraud in the national health service in Buton Islands from a hexagon model perspective

Submitted: 3 July 2024
Accepted: 27 October 2024
Published: 26 November 2024
Abstract Views: 0
PDF: 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Fraud in National Health Insurance of Indonesia, known as Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) services, is a problem that can potentially occur in all hospitals in Indonesia. This research aims to explore the factors that influence the occurrence of fraud from the perspective of the Hexagon model in JKN services in several hospitals in the Buton Islands. The Hexagon model, which consists of six key factors—opportunity, ability, arrogance, pressure, rationalization, and collusion—was used to systematically analyze the occurrence of fraud. This research uses an exploratory study method with in-depth interviews with 30 key informants. The research results show that the factor that most influences the occurrence of fraud is opportunity, followed by ability and arrogance. Although the model suggests pressure and rationalization as contributing factors, these elements remain ambiguous in this study due to insufficient supporting data. Collusion plays an important role in fraud but does not always occur. The study resulted in the development of a preliminary predictor model based on the findings, which can be used to identify risk factors for fraud in JKN services. This predictor model can be used to identify risk factors for fraud so that more effective prevention and response can be carried out.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Buku Pegangan Sosilaisasi Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) dalam Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional [Internet]. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2014. 76 p. Available from: https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/bpjs/BukuPeganganSosialisasiJKN-SJSN.pdf
Santoso B, Hendrartini J, Djoko Rianto BU, Trisnantoro L. System for Detection of National Healthcare Insurance Fraud Based on Computer Application. PHI 2018;4:46–56.
Palutturi S, Makkurade SR, Putri SE. Potential for Fraud of Health Service Claims to BPJS Health at Tenriawaru Public Hospital, Bone Regency, Indonesia. Internat J Innovat Creativity Change 2019;8:21.
Abu K. Potential of hospital fraud in the indonesia national health insurance era. a descriptive phenomenological research. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2020;14:1132–6.
Maidin A, Palutturi S. The study of implementation of National Health Insurance Cross Province (South Sulawesi, South East Sulawesi And, West Sulawesi), 2014. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia 2016;5:96–100.
Achmad T, Ghozali I, Pamungkas ID. Hexagon fraud: detection of fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned enterprises Indonesia. Economies 2022;10:13.
Vousinas GL. Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. J Financial Crime 2019;26:372–81.
Sadikin H, Adisasmito W. Analisis Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle Dalam Kebijakan Pencegahan Fraud Terhadap Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional di RSUP Nasional Cipto Mangunkusumo. Jurnal Ekonomi Kesehatan Indonesia 2016;1:28–34.
Agus Bandiyono. Fraud detection: religion in the workplace big data analytics. Jurnal Akuntans. 2023;27:380–400.
Firmansyah Y, Haryanto I, Ernawati. Fraud issues in the national health insurance (causes, legal impacts, dispute settlement and preventive measures). Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) 2022;2:1663–80.
Fund IM. Financial system abuse, financial crime and money laundering - background paper. Policy Papers 2001;2001:039.
Vian T. Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches. Glob Health Action 2020;13:1694744.
Sun X, Chen Y. Why do people with similar levels of internal control differ in their likelihood to commit fraud? Analysis of the moderating effect of perceived opportunity to commit fraud. Front Psychol 2022;13:999469.
Abdullahi R, Mansor N. Fraud triangle theory and fraud diamond theory. Understanding the convergent and divergent for future research. IJARAFMS 2015;5:38-45.
Fernandhytia F, Muslichah M. The effect of internal control, individual morality and ethical value on accounting fraud tendency. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen 2020;35:112–27.
Yulianti Y, Zarkasyi MW, Suharman H, Soemantri R. Effects of professional commitment, commitment to ethics, internal locus of control and emotional intelligence on the ability to detect fraud through reduced audit quality behaviors. J Islamic Account Business Res 2024;15:385-401.
Anderson C, Sharps DL, Soto CJ, John OP. People with disagreeable personalities (selfish, combative, and manipulative) do not have an advantage in pursuing power at work. Proceedings Nat Acad Sci 2020;117:22780–6.
Milyavsky M, Kruglanski AW, Chernikova M, Schori-Eyal N. Evidence for arrogance: On the relative importance of expertise, outcome, and manner. PLoS One 2017;12:e0180420.
Villegas-Ortega J, Bellido-Boza L, Mauricio D. Fourteen years of manifestations and factors of health insurance fraud, 2006–2020: a scoping review. Health Justice 2021;9:26.
Kartini K. Developing fraud prevention model in regional public hospital in West Sulawesi Province. Internat J Law Manag 2018;60:210–20.

How to Cite

Thaifur, A. Y. B. R. (2024). Exploratory study of factors influencing fraud in the national health service in Buton Islands from a hexagon model perspective. Healthcare in Low-Resource Settings. https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2024.12773