https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2024.12325
Comparative analysis of the results of laparoscopic and classical hepatic resections for multiple tumors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Submitted: 30 January 2024
Accepted: 22 March 2024
Published: 27 May 2024
Accepted: 22 March 2024
Abstract Views: 480
PDF: 111
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Laparoscopic removal of the affected part of the organ and classic laparotomic resection with open access for surgical manipulations are widespread. The choice of resection method is still controversial because researchers are currently talking about the importance of minimally invasive surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was primarily to compare the intraoperative, early, and late postoperative status of patients who underwent laparoscopic or laparotomic hepatic resection for multiple foci of hepatocellular carcinoma. In general, the operations using the laparoscopy method are much safer, because perioperative complications (including intense stress reactions with the appearance of hypertension, suppression of the immune response, tachycardia, and hypercoagulability) occur much less frequently than in the case of open-access intervention. Less invasiveness of laparoscopic operations contributes to a better recovery of patients after resection. On the other hand, laparotomy provides wider and faster access to the liver. This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of minimally invasive laparoscopic resections over classic laparotomic operations in patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple tumors.
World Cancer Research Fund International. Liver cancer statistics. 2020. Available from: https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/liver-cancer-statistics/
Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka Consensus Conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2016;5:281-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03
Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement. Ann Surg 2009;250:825-30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b3b2d8
Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, et al. The Southampton Consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 2018;268:11-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524
Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 2016;263:761-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413
Komorowski AL, Mitus JW, Wysocki WM, Bała MM. Laparoscopic and open liver resection – A literature review with meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci 2017;13:525-32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.55545
Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schoning W, Pratschke J. Laparoscopic liver resection: Indications, limitations, and economic aspects. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020;405:725-35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01918-8
Cipriani F, Ratti F, Cardella A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 2019;23:2163-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04112-4
Rubinkiewicz M, Mizera M, Malczak P, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resections of posterolateral liver segments – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2020;15:395-402.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.94268
Guerrini GP, Esposito G, Tarantino G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the first meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020;405:265-75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01877-0
Terminology Committee of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000;2:333-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-182X(17)30755-4
Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg 1964;1:1-85
He A, Huang Z, Wang J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis of short- and long-term outcomes. Open Med 2021;16:964-72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0308
Wang ZY, Chen QL, Sun LL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies. BMC Cancer 2019;19:1047.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6240-x
Yamamoto M, Kobayashi T, Oshita A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO). Surg Endosc 2020;34:5055-61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07302-y
Kabir T, Tan ZZ, Syn NL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: Meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021;109:21-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab376
Troisi RI, Berardi G, Morise Z, et al. Laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis: multicentre propensity score-matched study. Br J Surg 2021;108:196-204.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab234
Inoue Y, Fujii K, Ishii M, et al. Laparoscopic repeat hepatic resection for the management of liver tumours. J Gastrointest Surg 2019;23:2314-21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04276-z
US Food and Drug Administration. Caution with robotically-assisted surgical devices in mastectomy. 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/update-caution-robotically-assisted-surgical-devices-mastectomy-fda-safety-communication
Di Benedetto F, Petrowsky H, Magistri P, Halazun KJ. Robotic liver resection: hurdles and beyond. Int J Surg 2020;82:155-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.070
Machairas N, Papaconstantinou D, Tsilimigras DI, et al. Comparison between robotic and open liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Updates Surg 2019;71:39-48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00629-0
Halls MC, Alseidi A, Berardi G, et al. A comparison of the learning curves of laparoscopic liver surgeons in differing stages of the IDEAL paradigm of surgical innovation: standing on the shoulders of pioneers. Ann Surg 2019;269:221-28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002996
How to Cite
Tarasik, A. (2024). Comparative analysis of the results of laparoscopic and classical hepatic resections for multiple tumors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Healthcare in Low-Resource Settings. https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2024.12325
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.