https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2023.11813
Usefulness of antenatal care handbook: a cross-sectional study of mothers' perspectives
Submitted: 15 September 2023
Accepted: 14 November 2023
Published: 24 November 2023
Accepted: 14 November 2023
Abstract Views: 609
PDF: 161
HTML: 11
HTML: 11
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
In 2016, the Ministry of Health Brunei Darussalam introduced the Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Handbook, replacing the card-type record. Despite its implementation, the handbook's utility remains unexamined. This study aims to evaluate the community's usage of the MCH handbook and explore the connections between age, education, and handbook utilization. A cross-sectional study employed an online self-administered survey among pregnant women attending routine antenatal checkups at 32 weeks gestation between December 2020 and January 2021. The survey used the MCH Usefulness Questionnaire, and subgroup analysis was conducted. The study included 73 mothers. Most participants reported having sufficient time to read the handbook (95.9%), being familiar with its content (89.0%), and feeling satisfied with its usage (93.2%). Reasons for not using the handbook included "online availability of the same information" (20.5%), difficulty in understanding certain words (17.8%), preference for more visual content (12.3%), and inadequate encouragement from healthcare providers (12.3%). The majority of mothers perceive the handbook as useful. Nonetheless, further investigation is necessary to delve into their perceptions and ensure the handbook's sustained relevance and effectiveness over time.
Nakamura Y. The role of maternal and child health (MCH) handbook in the era of sustainable development goals (SDGs). J Glob Heal Sci 2019;1(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35500/jghs.2019.1.e24
Widianti N, Suryawan A, Irmawati M. Validity test of pre-screening developmental questionnaire (PDQ) and mother and child health (MCH) handbook for determining children’s readiness to enter elementary school. Bali Med J 2023;12:211–7.
Utami S, Susilaningrum R, Nursalam. The effect of health promotion based on the health promotion model with a peer group approach regarding the utilization of maternal and child health handbook. Indian J Public Heal Res Dev 2019;10:1987–92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.03139.5
Kawakatsu Y, Sugishita T, Oruenjo K, et al. Effectiveness of and factors related to possession of a mother and child health handbook: an analysis using propensity score matching. Health Educ Res 2015;30:935–46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyv048
WMA - The World Medical Association. WMA Statement on the Development and Promotion of a Maternal and Child Health Handbook. 2021.
Osaki K, Kosen S, Indriasih E, et al. Factors affecting the utilisation of maternal, newborn, and child health services in Indonesia: the role of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook. Public Health 2015;129:582–6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.01.001
Balogun OO, Tomo CK, Mochida K, et al. Impact of the Maternal and Child Health handbook in Angola for improving continuum of care and other maternal and child health indicators: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020;21:1–16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04664-w
Magwood O, Kpadé V, Thavorn K, et al. Effectiveness of home-based records on maternal, newborn and child health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019;14:e0209278.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209278
Mori R, Yonemoto N, Noma H, et al. The maternal and child health (MCH) handbook in Mongolia: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One 2015;10:e0119772.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119772
Aiga H, Nguyen VD, Nguyen CD, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practices: assessing maternal and child health care handbook intervention in Vietnam. BMC Public Health 2015;16:1–10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2788-4
Sudaryanti L, Mardhika A, Qona’Ah A, et al. Antenatal care of pregnant women during pandemic: A phenomenology study. J Pak Med Assoc 2023;73:S71–5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.Ind-S2-17
Gopalakrishnan S, Eashwar VMA, Muthulakshmi M. Health-seeking behaviour among antenatal and postnatal rural women in Kancheepuram District of Tamil Nadu: A cross-sectional Study. J Fam Med Prim Care 2019;8:1035.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_323_18
Istifa MN, Efendi F, Wahyuni ED, et al. Analysis of antenatal care, intranatal care and postnatal care utilization: Findings from the 2017 Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS One 2021;16:e0258340.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258340
Triharini M, Sulistyono A, Adriani M, Devy SR. The Effect of Health Promotion Intervention on Anemia Prevention Behavior and Haemoglobin Level in Pregnant Women: Based on Health Promotion Model and Self-Determination Theory. J Ners 2019;14:92–100.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v14i1.15213
Debessai Y, Costanian C, Roy M, et al. Inadequate prenatal care use among Canadian mothers: findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc 2016;36:420–6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.218
Moniz MH, Fendrick AM, Kolenic GE, et al. Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Maternity Care Among Women With Employer-Based Insurance, 2008-15. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020;39:18–23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00296
Sebayang SK, Efendi F, Astutik E. Women’s empowerment and the use of antenatal care services: analysis of demographic health surveys in five Southeast Asian countries. Women Heal 2019;59:1155–71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2019.1593282
Yunitasari E, Putri DUW, Armini NKA, et al. Analysis of factors that affect the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: A systematic review. J Pak Med Assoc 2023;73:S162–9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.Ind-S2-37
Yanagisawa S, Soyano A, Igarashi H, et al. Effect of a maternal and child health handbook on maternal knowledge and behaviour: a community-based controlled trial in rural Cambodia. Health Policy Plan 2015;30:1184–92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu133
Khasanah U, Efendi F, Has EMM, et al. Healthcare-seeking behavior for children aged 0–59 months: Evidence from 2002–2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Surveys. PLoS One 2023;18:e0281543.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281543
Habtu Y, Yohannes S, Laelago T. Health seeking behavior and its determinants for cervical cancer among women of childbearing age in Hossana Town, Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia: community based cross sectional study. BMC Cancer 2018;18:1–9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4203-2
Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D. Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health 2020;41:433–51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094127
Van Riel N, Auwerx K, Debbaut P, et al. The effect of Dr Google on doctor–patient encounters in primary care: a quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study. BJGP Open 2017;1(2).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X100833
Mardiyanti I, Devy SR, Ernawati E. Analysis of Sociodemographic and Information Factors on Family Behaviour in Early Detection of High-Risk Pregnancy. J Ners 2019;14:144–50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v14i2.16561
Ainiyah NH. The use of Maternal and Child Health (MCH) handbook improves healthy behavior of pregnant women. Maj Obstet Ginekol 2017;25:58–62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/mog.V25I22017.59-62
Tang J, Abraham C, Stamp E, Greaves C. How can weight‐loss app designers’ best engage and support users? A qualitative investigation. Br J Health Psychol 2015;20:151–71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12114
Lim S, Xue L, Yen CC, et al. A study on Singaporean women’s acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information. Int J Med Inform 2011;80:e189–202.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.007
Mahmood A, Kedia S, Wyant DK, et al. Use of mobile health applications for health-promoting behavior among individuals with chronic medical conditions. Digit Heal 2019;5:2055207619882181.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619882181
Bhuyan SS, Lu N, Chandak A, et al. Use of mobile health applications for health-seeking behavior among US adults. J Med Syst 2016;40:153.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0492-7
How to Cite
Anak Luta, Q., Abdul Mumin, K. H., Abdul Rahman , H., & Haji Hashim, S. (2023). Usefulness of antenatal care handbook: a cross-sectional study of mothers’ perspectives. Healthcare in Low-Resource Settings, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2023.11813
Copyright (c) 2023 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.