Does satisfaction with the manual wheelchair have an impact on the quality of life in spinal cord injury?


Submitted: 7 July 2023
Accepted: 29 September 2023
Published: 10 October 2023
Abstract Views: 408
PDF: 117
HTML: 5
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Background: Customised wheelchairs are integral component for comprehensive rehabilitation and community integration for spinal cord injury (SCI) survivors, while inappropriate wheelchairs negatively impact their functional independence, mobility and quality of life (QOL). Keeping this in mind, this study aimed to determine the effects of manual wheelchair users' satisfaction on QOL in SCI.

Methods: This cross-sectional study, which included 112 SCI, was conducted at the Paraplegic Centre, Hayatabad, Peshawar, over a period of 6 months using "Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)" and “World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF)” as study tools.

Results: QUEST showed a significant positive correlation with physical health (rs = 0.375; p< 0.001), social relationships (rs=0.234; p = 0.013), and environmental health (rs = 0.462; p<0.001) of QOL except psychological health, and similarly, overall health and overall QOL was positively impacted.  Furthermore, overall health and environmental, social relationships, and physical domains of QOL were statistically significantly impacted by the QUEST device and service aspects.

Conclusion: A moderate level of satisfaction among participants for both devices and services was observed, which also impacts their physical, environmental, and social domains of QOL. Therefore, steps from the key stakeholders are required to provide satisfactory appropriate wheelchairs to patients so their QOL can be improved.


Hamzat T. Psychosocial impact of wheelchair usage on individuals with mobility disability in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Med Health Sci 2015;44:89-94

Harvey LA. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injuries. J Physiother 2016;62:4-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.11.004

Florio J, Arnet U, Gemperli A, et al. Need and use of assistive devices for personal mobility by individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2016;39:461-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2015.1114228

Sonenblum SE, Sprigle SH, Martin JS. Everyday sitting behavior of full-time wheelchair users. J Rehabil Res Dev 2016;53:585-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.07.0130

Chen W-Y, Jang Y, Wang J-D, et al. Wheelchair-related accidents: relationship with wheelchair-using behavior in active community wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:892-898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.008

Adriaansen JJ, Ruijs LE, van Koppenhagen CF, et al. Secondary health conditions and quality of life in persons living with spinal cord injury for at least ten years. J Rehabil Med 2016;48:853-860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2166

Rivers CS, Fallah N, Noonan VK, et al. Health conditions: effect on function, health-related quality of life, and life satisfaction after traumatic spinal cord injury. A prospective observational registry cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99:443-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.012

Olaleye OA, Afolabi K, eds. Satisfaction with wheelchair use and health-related quality of life among persons with spinal cord injury in South-west Nigeria. Proceedings of the RESNA Annual Conference; 2019; Arlington.

Shore S, Juillerat S. The impact of a low cost wheelchair on the quality of life of the disabled in the developing world. Med Sci Monit 2012;18:CR533–CR542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.883348

Borade NIngle A, Nagarkar A. Lived experiences of people with mobility-related disability using assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2021;16:730-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1701105

Greer NBrasure M, Wilt TJ. Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:141-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00010

Ekman B, Mishra S. Sustainable and equitable provision of wheelchairs in low- and middle-income countries: an economic assessment of the models for wheelchair provision in Tajikistan. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2021;16:865-870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1745909

Mehmood B, Ali I, Daud SA, et al. Wheelchair User’s Satisfaction and its Impact on Physical Activity and Quality of Life in People with Spinal Cord Injury. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 2022:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1870-3090

de Groot S, Post M, Bongers-Janssen H, et al. Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury? Spinal Cord 2011;49:560-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.150

Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: An important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:551-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701355777

Amosun SNdosi A, Buchanan H. Locally manufactured wheelchairs in Tanzania–are users satisfied? Afr Health Sci 2016;16:1174-1181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v16i4.37

Visagie S, Mlambo T, Van der Veen J, et al. Impact of structured wheelchair services on satisfaction and function of wheelchair users in Zimbabwe. Afr J Disabil 2016;5(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v5i1.222

Sadiya APattnaik M, Mohanty P. Exploring the impact of manual wheelchair design on user’s satisfaction and function in individuals with spinal chord injury’. Asian J Sci Technol 2016;7:3464-3472

Lee S-H. Users’ satisfaction with assistive devices in South Korea. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;26:509-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.509

Marchiori C, Bensmail D. Manual wheelchair satisfaction among long-term users and caregivers: A French study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2015;52:181-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.04.0092

Geilen BG, de Witte L, Norman G, et al. Quality of wheelchair services as perceived by users in rural Bangalore district, India: a cross-sectional survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2020:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1839576

Sugawara AT, Seigui Oshiro M, Yamanaka EI, et al. Developing a rigid frame wheelchair in Brazil. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2019;16:538-544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1684578

Shea JR, Shay BL, Leiter J, et al. Energy expenditure as a function of activity level after spinal cord injury: the need for tetraplegia-specific energy balance guidelines. Front Physiol 2018;9:1286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01286

Shore S. The long-term impact of wheelchair delivery on the lives of people with disabilities in three countries of the world. Afr J Disabil 2017;6:344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v6i0.344

Chan SC, Chan AP. User satisfaction, community participation and quality of life among Chinese wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study. Occup Ther Int 2007;14:123-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.228

Wolf N, Maseko L, Franzsen D, et al. Wheelchair prescription after spinal cord injury: satisfaction and functional mobility. S Afr J Occup Ther 2022;52:68-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2022/vol52n1a8

Nas K, Yazmalar L, Şah V, et al. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World J Orthop 2015;6:8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.8

Mehmood, B. (2023). Does satisfaction with the manual wheelchair have an impact on the quality of life in spinal cord injury?. Healthcare in Low-Resource Settings, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2023.11526

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations