Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and real life

Submitted: 17 February 2013
Accepted: 17 February 2013
Published: 20 February 2006
Abstract Views: 753
PDF: 1030
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Beloveds are, probably, the most well known and widely-read guidelines in Medicine. Although for decades these guidelines are regularly revisited every 5 years, the survival to cardiac arrest on the territory remain unsatisfactory, attesting itself on 6,4% or less. These discouraging outcomes caused some reflections on the validity of the guidelines concrete application. Some reviews, supported by the results of some good studies recently published, and the introduction of new technologies have produced remarkable changes not only in the guidelines, but also in the methodology subtended to the review process, and the consequent creation of new recommendations. The recent publication on Circulation of the 2005 guidelines is the standing point for an analysis of the great changes carried out.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Prevaldi, C., Ragusa, G., & D’Este, F. (2006). Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and real life. Emergency Care Journal, 2(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2006.1.38