https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2024.12745
Do not move! Spinal immobilization or spinal motor restriction: the long-lasting debate from the Napoleonic Wars to 2024 SIMEU policy statement
Published: 27 June 2024
Abstract Views: 407
PDF: 340
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The management of spinal trauma in the pre-hospital setting is based on techniques of immobilization for prevention of secondary neurological damage in high-risk patients during transportation.1 Since the ’70s, the traditional form of Preventive Spinal Immobilization (PSI) has been carried out using a long spinal board, head blocks, and immobilization straps often associated with the placement of a cervical collar.2 The first documentation of this practice comes from the early 19th century, when pre-hospital trauma care was introduced on the battlefields of the Napoleonic Wars.3 This strategy is still adopted by many pre-hospital medical services worldwide and taught as the gold standard on many trauma courses. The traditional form of PSI is indeed based more on pragmatism than on high-quality studies supporting its efficacy.3 [...]
Stuke LE, Pons PT, Guy JS, et al. Pre-hospital spine immobilization for penetrating trauma— review and recommendations from the pre-hospital trauma life support executive committee. J Trauma 2011;71:763–9.
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Committee on injuries. Emergency care and transportation of the sick and injured. Chicago, IL: The Academy; 1971.
Ten Brinke JG, Groen SR, Dehnad M, et al. Pre-hospital care of spinal injuries: a historical quest for reasoning and evidence. Eur Spine J 2018;27:2999-3006.
Kwan I, Bunn F. Effects of pre-hospital spinal immobilization: a systematic review of randomized trials on healthy subjects. Prehosp Disaster Med 2005;20:47-53.
Oosterwold JT, Sagel DC, Van Grunsven PM, et al The characteristics and pre-hospital management of blunt trauma patients with suspected spinal column injuries: a retrospective observational study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017;43:513–24
Davies G, Deakin C, Wilson A. The effect of a rigid collar on intracranial pressure. Injury 1996;27:647-9.
Hunt K, Hallworth S, Smith M. The effects of rigid collar placement on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures. Anaesthesia 2001;56:511-3.
Cordell WH, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, et al. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:31-6.
Ham W, Schoonhoven L, Schuurmans MJ, Leenen LP. Pressure ulcers from spinal immobilization in trauma patients: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:1131-41.
Totten VY, Sugarman DB. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999;3:347-52.
Liao S, Schneider NRE, Hüttlin P, et al. Motion and dural sac compression in the upper cervical spine during the application of a cervical collar in case of unstable craniocervical junction-A study in two new cadaveric trauma models. PLoS One 2018;13:e0195215.
Ms R, Riffelmann M, Kunze-Szikszay N, et al. Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2021;29:46.
Stuby L, Thurre D. Time performance of scoop stretcher versus vacuum mattress for pre-hospital spinal stabilization: open-label simulation-based randomized controlled trial. Emerg Care J 2024;20:12226
Hawkridge K, Ahmed I, Ahmed Z. Evidence for the use of spinal collars in stabilising spinal injuries in the pre-hospital setting in trauma patients: a systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022;48:647-57.
Haut ER, Kalish BT, Efron DT, et al. Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good? J Trauma 2010;68:115-20; discussion 120-1.
Castro-Marin F, Gaither JB, Rice AD, et al. Pre-hospital protocols reducing long spinal board use are not associated with a change in incidence of spinal cord injury. Prehosp Emerg Care 2020;24:401-10.
Underbrink L, Dalton AT, Leonard J, et al. New immobilization guidelines change EMS critical thinking in older adults with spine trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care 2018;22:637-44.
Fischer PE, Perina DG, Delbridge TR, et al. Spinal motion restriction in the trauma patient - a joint position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care 2018;22:659-61.
Dixon M, O'Halloran J, Cummins NM. Biomechanical analysis of spinal immobilization during pre-hospital extrication: a proof of concept study. Emerg Med J 2014;31:745-9.
Häske D, Schier L, Weerts JON, et al. An explorative, biomechanical analysis of spine motion during out-of-hospital extrication procedures. Injury 2020;51:185-92.
Nutbeam T, Kehoe A, Fenwick R, et al. Do entrapment, injuries, outcomes and potential for self-extrication vary with age? A pre-specified analysis of the UK trauma registry (TARN). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2022;30:14.
Hawkins SC, Williams J, Bennett BL, et al. Wilderness medical society clinical practice guidelines for spinal cord protection: 2024 update. Wilderness Environ Med 2024;35:78S-93S.
How to Cite
Serra, S., Poggiali, E., Rugna, M., De Iaco, F., & Ghiadoni, L. (2024). Do not move! Spinal immobilization or spinal motor restriction: the long-lasting debate from the Napoleonic Wars to 2024 SIMEU policy statement. Emergency Care Journal, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2024.12745
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
