Effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on hemodynamic changes and block profile following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine among patients with femoral fractures undergoing lower limb surgery

Submitted: 8 May 2022
Accepted: 16 May 2022
Published: 3 February 2023
Abstract Views: 1003
PDF: 610
HTML: 44
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on hemodynamic changes and block characteristics following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine among patients with femoral fractures undergoing lower limb surgery. In this double-blind clinical trial, 64 patients who were candidates for lower limb surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on the block pattern. In the first group, dexmedetomidine was prescribed. In the second group, fentanyl with ropivacaine was prescribed. Sensory and motor blocks at or above the T8 dermatome in each group were measured. Furthermore, the sensory block was evaluated every 1 minute after anesthesia with a needle (pin prick method) and also the motor block was evaluated every 5 minutes by the bromage scale. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the time for achieving sensory block to T8 or higher dermatome (p = 0.0001). The time elapsed until the onset of motor block was shorter in the dexmedetomidine group, and dexmedetomidine had a shorter time for achieving sensory block to T8 or higher dermatome than fentanyl. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of the time elapsed until the motor block and the time for achieving sensory block to the T8 dermatome or higher (p <0.05). The time elapsed until the onset of motor block was shorter in the dexmedetomidine group, and dexmedetomidine had a shorter time for achieving sensory block to T8 or higher dermatome than fentanyl. Our findings revealed a statistically significant difference in terms of the duration of sensory block for reaching the T12 to L1 dermatome and the duration of obtaining bromide scores 0 and 1 (p = 0.0001). The time for achieving sensory block to dermatome T12 to L1 and the time of obtaining bromage scales of 0 and 1 were longer in dexmedetomidine group (p = 0.0001). Pain in dexmedetomidine group was less than fentanyl group in 2 to 8 hours after surgery (p <0.05). The duration of analgesia was longer in the dexmedetomidine group (p = 0.001). In summary, it can be suggested that adding dexmedetomidine to the anesthetic ropivacaine may be beneficial.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Miller R. Spinal, epidural and caudal anesthesia. Miller’s Anesthesia. Churchill Livingstone: Elsvier; 2015:1611-2-4-5.
Kamali A, Zareei A, Moshiri E, Farokhi F. Comparing the Effect of Adding Ketamine and Neostigmine to Bupivacaine 0.25 % for Epidural Analgesia among Patients Candidated for Elective Femoral Fracture Surgery. International Journal of Medical Research&Health Sciences. 2016;5 (11):63-7.
Larson MD. Tait and Caglieri. The first spinal anesthetic in America. Anesthesiology. 1996 Oct;85(4):913-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199610000-00028
Pazuki S KA, Shahrokhi N, Jamilian M. Comparison of the Effects of Intrathecal Midazolam and Tramadol with the Conventional Method of Postoperative Pain and Shivering Control after Elective Cesarean Section. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2016;9(3): 995-1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1039
Pankaj K, Rajan PS. Alpha 2 agonists in regional anaesthesia practice: Efficient yet safe?. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(6):681-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.147127
Radbin T, Kamali A, Yazdi B, Pazouki S, Hadi H, Rakei S. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine and ketamine addition to bupivacaine 0.25% by epidural method in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing femur fracture surgery. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Feb;10(2):832-837. Epub 2021 Feb 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1506_20
Taher-Baneh N, Ghadamie N, Sarshivi F, Sahraie R, Nasseri K. Comparação de fentanil e dexmedetomidina como adjuvante à bupivacaína para raquianestesia unilateral em cirurgia de membros inferiores: estudo randômico [Comparison of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia in lower limb surgery: a randomized trial]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jul-Aug;69(4):369-376. Portuguese. Epub 2019 Jul 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.03.005
Rahimzadeh P, Faiz SHR, Imani F, Derakhshan P, Amniati S. Comparative addition of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine in orthopedic procedure in lower limbs. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jun 6;18(1):62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0531-7
Ravipati P, Isaac GA, Reddy PN, Krishna L, Supritha T. A Comparative Study between Intrathecal Isobaric Ropivacaine 0.75% Plus Dexmedetomidine and Isobaric Ropivacaine 0.75% Plus Fentanyl for Lower Limb Surgeries. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):621-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.206857
Andersen JH, Grevstad U, Siegel H, Dahl JB, Mathiesen O, Jæger P. Does Dexmedetomidine Have a Perineural Mechanism of Action When Used as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine?: A Paired, Blinded, Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):66-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001429
Giovannitti JA Jr, Thoms SM, Crawford JJ. Alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists: a review of current clinical applications. Anesth Prog. 2015;62(1):31-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-62.1.31
Jagtap S, Chhabra A, Dawoodi S, Jain A. Comparison of intrathecal ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl for major lower limb orthopaedic surgery: A randomised double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;58(4):442-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.138985
Chaudhary A, Bogra J, Singh PK, Saxena S, Chandra G, Verma R. Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;8(1):88-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.125951
Hu X, Li J, Zhou R, Wang Q, Xia F, Halaszynski T, Xu X. Dexmedetomidine Added to Local Anesthetic Mixture of Lidocaine and Ropivacaine Enhances Onset and Prolongs Duration of a Popliteal Approach to Sciatic Nerve Blockade. Clin Ther. 2017 Jan;39(1):89-97.e1. Epub 2016 Dec 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.011
Kamali A, Shokrpour M, Aminloo R, Pazuki S. Comparing the effect of adding dexmedetomidine and tramadol to lidocaine 5% in elongating the period of post-operative analgesia in spinal anesthesia. Biomed Res 2018 ; 29 (3): 454-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-17-3437
Sharma B, Rupal S, Swami AC, Lata S. Effect of addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine 0.2% for femoral nerve block in patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement: A randomised double-blind study [published correction appears in Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;60(7):529]. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(6):403-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.183392

How to Cite

Hosseini, R., Pazoki, S., Hadi, H. A., Alimohammadi, A., & Kamali, A. (2023). Effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on hemodynamic changes and block profile following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine among patients with femoral fractures undergoing lower limb surgery. European Journal of Translational Myology, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2023.10610