See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial
Laryngospasm is an important complication of tonsillectomies. This study aimed to compare the effects of propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy. This randomized clinical trial included 102 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly divided into two groups treated with 0.5 mg/kg propofol (group P) or 1 mg/kg lidocaine 2% (group L). The frequencies of laryngospasm (within 10 min after extubation), agitation, nausea, vomiting, mean heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were assessed in both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 at a 95% confidence level. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age or weight. In the P group, the frequency of laryngospasm was significantly lower than L within10 minutes after extubation (4.1% versus 16.3%). Furthermore, the frequencies of agitation (p = 0.003), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.002) and mean heart rate (p = 0.026) were significantly higher in the L group than the P group. However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, MAP, SPO2, awakening time, length of stay in recovery and frequency of shivering. Propofol can reduce the incidence of laryngospasm, agitation, nausea and vomiting but it has no effect on the patient's awakening time and length of stay in recovery.
Downloads
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.