https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.10422
Clinical and radiological results of using proximal femoral locking compression plate and proximal femoral nail antirotation for subtrochanteric fractures
Submitted: 20 February 2022
Accepted: 24 February 2022
Published: 12 May 2022
Accepted: 24 February 2022
Abstract Views: 1067
PDF: 409
HTML: 5
HTML: 5
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fracture in the use of proximal femoral locking compression plate (PFLCP) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). This retrospective study was performed on patients who referred to Firoozgar Hospital in 2017 with subtrochanteric fracture. During follow-up, control radiographs were obtained from patients and the Harris Hip Score questionnaire was completed. Finally, the data were entered into Spss version 22 and then analyzed. A total of 56 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two treatment groups of 28: including groups with locking plate and nailing treatment. The results showed that the treatment was not significantly different in patients with subtrochanteric fractures who were treated with either intramedullary nailing or plate placement. There is no difference between the two groups in any of the parameters. The two groups were similar in terms of fracture classification, and finally no significant difference was found in terms of union findings. This study showed that clinical and imaging findings are not significantly different between the two groups of patients with subtrochanteric fracture who are treated with nailing or plate placement.
Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM, Einhorn TA, Wang Y, Steinbuch M, Cosman F. Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Mar;21(3):399-408. Epub 2009 May 30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0962-6
Mohseni M, Sadeghpour A, Mohseni S. Demographic characteristics of patients with proximal femoral fractures in an educational center in tabriz. Iranian J Orthopaed Sur, [online] 2015:13[4(53)]:183-187. Available: https://www. sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=605158.
Ng AC, Drake MT, Clarke BL, Sems SA, Atkinson EJ, Achenbach SJ, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in subtro-chanteric, diaphyseal, and distal femur fractures, 1984-2007. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(6):1721-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1777-9
Maravic M, Ostertag A, Cohen-Solal M. Subtrochanteric/femoral shaft versus hip fractures: incidences and identification of risk factors. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Jan;27(1):130-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.517
Raval P, Ramasamy A, Raza H, Khan K, Awan N. Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures. Malays Orthop J. 2016 Mar;10(1):22-28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1603.005
Maruthi CV, Shivanna S. Proximal fe moral nail in the management of intertrochantric fractures: A prospective study. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2020;4(75):13063-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/1881
Hong JB, Dan Y, Ouyang L, Liu Y, Xiong LM, Li S, Feng XB, Shao ZW, Yan C, Yang SH, Liu P. Biomechanical study on different lengths of PFNA fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2017 Dec 1;17(4):299-302.
Wei J, Qin DA, Guo XS. [Curative effect analysis on proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture and integrity of lateral trochanteric wall]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Jun;28(6):572-5. Chinese.
Nyholm AM, Palm H, Malchau H, Troelsen A, Gromov K. Lacking evidence for performance of implants used for proximal femoral fractures - A systematic review. Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):586-94. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.001
Ponkilainen VT, Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Mattila VM. Hardware removal rates after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures: Nationwide trends in Finland in 1997-2016. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(8):1047-54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03356-z
Khoori M, Moharrami A, Hoseini Zare N, Mortazavi SJ. The Importance of Length of the Cephalomedullary Nails for Fixation of the Proximal Femoral Fractures: An Educational Corner. J Orthop Spine Trauma. 2021;6(3):55-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v6i3.4963
Kim KK, Won Y, Smith DH, Lee GS, Lee HY. Clinical Results of Complex Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures with Long Cephalomedullary Hip Nail. Hip Pelvis. 2017 Jun;29(2):113-119.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.2.113
Pervez H, Parker MJ. Results of the long Gamma nail for complex proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 2001 Nov;32(9):704-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00022-5
Yoon BH, Lee YK, Kim SC, Kim SH, Ha YC, Koo KH. Epidemiology of proximal femoral fractures in South Korea. Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:157. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0157-9
Tencer AF, Johnson KD, Johnston DW, Gill K. A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Res. 1984;2(3):297-305.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100020312
Pankovich AM, Tarabishy IE. Ender nailing of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(4):635-45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198062040-00019
Lindvall E, Ghaffar S, Martirosian A, Husak L. Short Versus Long Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: Incidence of Ipsilateral Fractures and Costs Associated With Each Implant. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Mar;30(3):119-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000420
Won Y, Yang KH, Kim KK, Weaver MJ, Allen EM. Amputated limb by cerclage wire of femoral diaphyseal fracture: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Dec;136(12):1691-1694. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2580-z
Azboy I, Demirtaş A, Gem M, Cakır IA, Tutak Y. A comparison of proximal femoral locking plate versus 95-degree angled blade plate in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric fractures. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2014;25(1):15-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2014.04
Huang SG, Chen B, Zhang Y, Nie FF, Ju L, Li M, Zhang YH. Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of PFNA, PFLCP, and DHS in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture. Am J Ther. 2017 Nov/Dec;24(6):e659-e666.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000000346
Srinivasan P, Balasubramaniam S, Dhinesh NL. Management of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures with Proximal Femur Locking Compression Plate - A Prospective Study. IOSR J Dental Med Sci. 2020; 19 (1): 17-26.
Yeganeh A, Otoukesh B, Kaghazian P, Yeganeh N, Boddohi B, Moghtadaei M. Evaluation of the Etiologies of Implant Fracture in Patients With Fractures of the Implants of Lower Limbs' Long Bones. Med Arch. 2015 Dec;69(6):405-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2015.69.405-408
Moghtadaei M, Otoukesh B, Pazoki-Toroudi H, Boddouhi B, Yeganeh A. Evaluation of inflammatory response in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early and delayed femoral fractures. Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jan;15(1):141-145. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.63013
How to Cite
Khadem, M., Torkaman, A., Pisoudeh, K., Bahari, M., & Torkaman, P. (2022). Clinical and radiological results of using proximal femoral locking compression plate and proximal femoral nail antirotation for subtrochanteric fractures. European Journal of Translational Myology, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.10422
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.