https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.10411
Developing a novel prediction model for the impact of varicocelectomy on postoperative fertility
Submitted: 15 February 2022
Accepted: 19 February 2022
Published: 2 May 2022
Accepted: 19 February 2022
Abstract Views: 1083
PDF: 508
HTML: 15
HTML: 15
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The objective of this study was to evaluate inflammatory markers as predictors of fertility after varicocelectomy and to develop a prediction model. This prospective cohort was conducted on patients with varicoceles who were presented to the clinic of Imam Reza hospital of Tehran during 2019-2020. Semen analysis, complete blood count (CBC), and scrotal ultrasonography was requested. Patients with abnormalities of semen analysis were chosen as candidates for varicocelectomy. 6 months after the operation, semen analysis was repeated. Hematologic and semen analysis parameters were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits. Treatment success was defined as 50% increase in total motile sperm count (TMSC) in cases with preoperative TMSC> 5 million/cc or 100% increase in TMSC in cases with preoperative TMSC< 5 million/cc. Patients were then categorized into two groups based on treatment success and statistical analysis was performed on these two groups. 124 infertile patients with varicocele were evaluated in our study. 52 patients (41.93%) showed improvements in semen analysis after varicocelectomy. After univariate and multivariate analysis three parameters were used in our predictive model as body mass index (BMI)>23.70 kg/m2 (4 scores), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >1.80 (3 scores), and TMSC<14.69 million (2 scores). A cut-off value of 5 was associated with an 87.5% sensitivity and an 84.6% specificity for the prediction of failure of varicocelectomy. Varicocelectomy can improve semen analysis parameters in almost all infertile men with varicocele. Using BMI, NLR, and baseline TMSC as the suggested scoring system can predict the success of varicocelectomy for improving fertility and determine the appropriate infertile candidates for surgery.
Stankovic ́J, Bosˇnjakovic P. Changes in sperm density caused by varicocele and their treatment using scleroembolization or high spermatic vein ligation. Med Biol. 2006:13, 15–18. Corpus ID: 20501610.
Leung L, Ho KL, Tam PC, Yiu MK. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for male factor subfertility: a ten-year experience. Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Aug;19(4):334-40. Epub 2013 May 6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj133884
Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Jan-Feb;7(1):59-64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.1.59
Goldstein, M. (2020). Surgical management of male infertility. In A. Wein, L. R. Kavoussi, R. R. Dmochowski, & C. A. Peters (Eds.), Campbell-Walsh urology (pp. 1476–1483). Philadelphia, PA; Elsevier Saunders.
Mallidis C, Czerwiec A, Filippi S, et al. Spermatogenic and sperm quality differences in an experimental model of metabolic syndrome and hypogonadal hypogonadism. Reproduction. 2011;142:63–71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0472
Wright EJ, Young GPH, Goldstein M. Reduction in testicular temperature after varicocelectomy in infertile men. Urology. 1997;50:257–60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00191-X
Inci K, Gunay LM. The role of varicocele treatment in the management of non-obstructive azoospermia. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):89-98.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(Sup01)10
Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60:796–808.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018
Redmon JB, Carey P, Pryor JL. Varicocele--the most common cause of male factor infertility? Hum Reprod Update. 2002 Jan-Feb;8(1):53-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.1.53
Will MA, Swain J, Fode M. The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:841–52.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.002
Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AMBest practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:873–82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03105-9
Verim S, Uguz S, Celikkanat S. Prognostic Predictors of Fertility in Young Adult Patients With Varicocele: Peak Retrograde Flow Velocity and Reflux Grade. J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Jun;35(6):1241-50. Epub 2016 May 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.07072
Bernstein AP, Fram EB, North A, Casale A, Drzewiecki BA. Does total testicular volume predict testicular volume difference in adolescent males with varicocele? Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Sep-Oct;44(5):981-986.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0652
Bozkurt Y, Soylemez H, Sancaktutar AA, Islamoglu Y, Kar A, Penbegul N, Atar M, Bodakci MN, Hatipoglu NK. Relationship between mean platelet volume and varicocele: a preliminary study. Urology. 2012 May;79(5):1048-51. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.019
Polat H, Gulpinar MT, Sarıca MA, Benlioglu C. Relationship between mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, plateletcrit and varicocele. Andrologia. 2017 Feb;49(1). Epub 2016 May 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12594
Demirer Z, Karademir I, Uslu AU, Güragac A, Aksu Y. The relationship between inflammation and mean platelet volume in varicocele pathophysiology. Rev Int Androl. 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):137-142. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2017.06.005
Ates E, Ucar M. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a new prognostic predictor after microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. 2019;51(2):e13188
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13188
Xiao-Bin G, Fang-Lei W, Hui X, et al. The association between body mass index and varicocele: A meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):8-19.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0210
Hammoud AO, Wilde N, Gibson M, Parks A, Carrell DT, Meikle AW. Male obesity and alteration in sperm parameters. Fertil Steril. 2008 Dec;90(6):2222-5. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.011
Chen SS, Chen LK. Predictive factors of successful varicocelectomy in infertile patients. Urol Int. 2011;86(3):320-4. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000322825
Pham KN, Sandlow JI. The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of varicocelectomy. J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):219-21. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.033
Shabana W, Teleb M, Dawod T, et al. Predictors of improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy for male subfertility: A prospective study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(9-10):E579-E582.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2808
Matkov TG, Zenni M, Sandlow J. Preoperative semen analysis as a predictor of seminal improvement following varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:63–68.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01644-7
Gui X, Chen JC, Sun XQ, Wen RM, Chen RF, Zheng JN, Zhang CJ. [The value of pre-operative semen analysis as a restore index of fertilizing capacity after varicocelectomy]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2006 Feb;12(2):145-7. Chinese.
Jallouli H, Hadj Slimen M, Sahnoun A, Kechou S, Ben Amar S, Bahloul A, Mhiri MN. Surgical treatment of varicocele improves fertility and facilitates medically assisted procreation. Prog Urol. 2008 Sep;18(8):543-9. French. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.03.032
Cayan S, Erdemir F, Ozbey I, Turek PJ, Kadioğlu A, Tellaloğlu S. Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couples use assisted reproductive technologies? J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1749-52.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65192-0
Takeuchi T, Nagao K, Aono N. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on semen parameters and clinical outcome in severe male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.644
Wang Q, Yu Y, Liu Y, Wang L. Outcome of varicocelectomy on different degrees of total motile sperm count: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2019 Dec;65(6):430-436. 1655813. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2019.1655813
Schrepferman C, Ehle J, Sparks A, Donovan J, Sandlow J. Preoperative total motile count (TMC) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are predictive of response to varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(3):S240.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01431-X
Gondo T, Nakashima J, Ohno Y, Choichiro O, Horiguchi Y, Namiki K, Yoshioka K, Ohori M, Hatano T, Tachibana M. Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and establishment of novel preoperative risk stratification model in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy. Urology. 2012 May;79(5):1085-91. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.070
Moore MM, Chua W, Charles KA, Clarke SJ. Inflammation and cancer: causes and consequences. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Apr;87(4):504-8. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2009.254
Deng Q, He B, Liu X, Yue J, Ying H, Pan Y, Sun H, Chen J, Wang F, Gao T, Zhang L, Wang S. Prognostic value of pre-operative inflammatory response biomarkers in gastric cancer patients and the construction of a predictive model. J Transl Med. 2015 Feb 18;13:66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0409-0
Al Murri AM, Wilson C, Lannigan A, Doughty JC, Angerson WJ, McArdle CS, McMillan DC. Evaluation of the relationship between the systemic inflammatory response and cancer-specific survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007 Mar 26;96(6):891-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603682
Jamieson NB, Glen P, McMillan DC, McKay CJ, Foulis AK, Carter R, Imrie CW. Systemic inflammatory response predicts outcome in patients undergoing resection for ductal adenocarcinoma head of pancreas. Br J Cancer. 2005 Jan 17;92(1):21-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602305
Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, Vera-Badillo FE, Aneja P, Ocaña A, Leibowitz-Amit R, Sonpavde G, Knox JJ, Tran B, Tannock IF, Amir E. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 29;106(6):dju124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju124
Mosmiller LT, Steele KN, Shrader CD, Petrone AB. Evaluation of inflammatory cell biomarkers in chronic venous insufficiency. Phlebology. 2017 Oct;32(9):634-640. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355517701806
How to Cite
Kandevani, N. Y., Namdari, F., Hamidi, M., Dialameh, H., & Behzadi, A. (2022). Developing a novel prediction model for the impact of varicocelectomy on postoperative fertility. European Journal of Translational Myology, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.10411
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.