Reliability and validity analysis of Turkish version of the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-10 questionnaire

Submitted: February 22, 2024
Accepted: March 28, 2024
Published: May 17, 2024
Abstract Views: 544
PDF: 196
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Introduction: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-10 (LURN SI-10).
Materials and methods: In this, single-centre study, patients between 18 and 65 years old, who were suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) without any known urinary tract disease and on no medication, were enrolled. The control group consisted of participants, who were admitted to our clinic suffering from any complaint except LUTS and met all of the other inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants’ demographics such as age, sex, and level of education were recorded. The Turkish version of the LURN SI-10, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8) were administered to all participants. Construct validity was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis and concurrent validity was evaluated with correlations to similar measures. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was used to establish the scale's internal consistency reliability.
Results: A total of 164 participants were included in the final analysis. Of those, 57% were male. The individuals were identified as being in the “patient group” (n = 86) and a “control group” (n = 78). The mean age was 48.24 ± 14.30 years. The median total LURN SI-10 scores of patient group and control group were 12.0 (9-18.25) and 4.0 (2.75-6), respectively. The LURN SI-10 questionnaire showed a high correlation with the IPSS and the OAB-V8 questionnaires (r: 0.761; p: 0.001; r: 0.737; p: 0.001, respectively) in concurrent validity analysis. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the LURN SI-10 was 0.850.
Conclusions: This promising measurement tool can be used to evaluate LUTS in Turkish women and men. Further studies should be conducted to assess the clinical usefulness of this questionnaire.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006; 50:1306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019
Selekman RE, Harris CR, Filippou P, et al. Validation of a Visual Prostate Symptom Score in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in a Health Safety Net Hospital. Urology. 2015; 86:354-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.012
Yang CC, Weinfurt KP, Merion RM, et al. Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network. J Urol. 2016; 196:146-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.007
Cella D, Smith AR, Griffith JW, et al. A new outcome measure for LUTS: Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-29 (LURN SI-29) questionnaire. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019; 38:1751-1759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24067
Cella D, Smith AR, Griffith JW, et al. LURN Study Group. A New Brief Clinical Assessment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms for Women and Men: LURN SI-10. J Urol. 2020; 203:164-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000465
Bozlu M, Doruk E, Akbay E, et al. Effect of administration mode (patient vs physician) and patient's educational level on the Turkish version of the International Prostate Symptom Score. Int J Urol. 2002; 9:417-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00491.x
Tarcan T, Mangır N, Özgür MO, et al. Constitution and Validation of a New Symptom Assessment Tool for Overactive Bladder: Marmara Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (M-OBQ). Journal of Urological Surgery 2014; 1:24-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/jus.141
Okamura K, Nojiri Y, Osuga Y, Tange C. Psychometric analysis of international prostate symptom score for female lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology. 2009; 73:1199-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.054
Coyne K, Revicki D, Hunt T, et al. Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: the OAB-q. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11:563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016370925601
Coyne KS, Zyczynski T, Margolis MK, et al. Validation of an overactive bladder awareness tool for use in primary care settings. Adv Ther 2005; 22:381-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850085
Tarcan T, Mangır N, Özgür MÖ, Akbal C. OAB-V8 As¸ırı Aktif Mesane Sorgulama Formu Validasyon Çalıs¸ması. Üroloji Bülteni 2012; 21:113-116.
Culpan M, Acar HC, Cella D, et al. Turkish validation and reliability of the symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-29 (LURN SI-29) questionnaire in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021; 40:2034-2040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24791
Helfand BT, Smith AR, Lai HH, et. al. Prevalence and characteristics of urinary incontinence in a treatment seeking male prospective cohort: results from the LURN study. J Urol 2018; 200:397-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.075
Glaser AP, Kristof TW, Judge C, et al. The 10-item LURN Symptom Index (LURN SI-10) Detects Additional Symptoms and Shows Convergent Validity With the IPSS in Men Presenting With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Urology. 2023; 171:184-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.10.019

How to Cite

Akan, S., Tavukcu, H. H., Culpan, M., & Cella, D. (2024). Reliability and validity analysis of Turkish version of the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-10 questionnaire. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 96(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12415