Adverse events related to laser fibers and laser machines during ureteroscopy and stone lithotripsy: Insights from an updated 10-year analysis of the US MAUDE database

Published: October 2, 2024
Abstract Views: 282
PDF: 139
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Introduction: Ureteroscopy has become increasingly chosen as a treatment of choice for patients with kidney stone disease and laser as the energy source for stone lithotripsy is a key part of this. Our aim was to analyse a national database to evaluate the burden of adverse events related to laser fibers and laser machines.
Methods: Search was performed of the Manufacturer User and Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database in the United States for all events related to holmium laser fibers and holmium laser machines during ureteroscopy between 2012-2021. Information collected included the following: problem, timing, prolonged anaesthesia, early termination of procedure, injury and retained parts.
Results: 699 holmium laser fiber events were reported and these had been manufactured by 13 different companies. The commonest problems were breakage outside the patient while in use (26.3%) and breakage of the laser fiber tip (21.2%). Manufacturers concluded root cause to be device failure in 8.9%. 29% of issues occurred before the laser had been activated. 5.2% of cases had to be cancelled as a result of an event. Significantly more injuries were sustained intra-operatively by operating staff compared to patients (6% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001). All these injuries were superficial burns to the skin with the hand being the most affected body part (88.1%). Zero ocular injuries were reported. Only eight events were related to laser machines and all involved sudden hardware failure but no patient injury.
Conclusions: Laser fibers are fragile. Most adverse events are due to operator error. Direct patient injury from laser fiber is scarce but operating staff should be aware of the risk of sustaining minor burns. Laser machines rarely incur problems and, in this study, did not result in any safety issues beyond need to abort the procedure due to lack of spare equipment.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Herout R, Baunacke M, Groeben C, et al. Contemporary treatment trends for upper urinary tract stones in a total population analysis in Germany from 2006 to 2019: will shock wave lithotripsy become extinct? World J Urol. 2022;40:185-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03818-y
Jour I, Lam A, Turney B. Urological stone disease: a 5-year update of stone management using Hospital Episode Statistics. BJU Int. 2022;130:364-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15728
Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK. Worldwide Trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol. 2017;31:547-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0895
Staehler G, Hofstetter A, Gorisch W, et al. Endoscopy in experimental urology using an argon-laser beam. Endoscopy. 1976;8:1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1098365
Kronenberg P, Cerrato C, Juliebo-Jones P, et al. Advances in lasers for the minimally invasive treatment of upper and lower urinary tract conditions: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2023;41:3817-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04669-5
Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, Haugland JN, et al. Advances in ureteroscopy: new technologies and current innovations in the era of Tailored Endourological Stone Treatment (TEST). J Clin Urol. 2023;16:190-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221115986
Gurtcheff SE. Introduction to the MAUDE database. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51:120-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e318161e657
Lee J, Kaplan-Marans E, Jivanji D, et al. Post-cystoscopy infections and device malfunctions in reprocessed flexible cystoscopes in a national database. Can J Urol. 2022;29:11361-5.
Althunayan AM, Elkoushy MA, Elhilali MM, Andonian S. Adverse events resulting from lasers used in urology. J Endourol. 2014;28:256-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0451
Food and Drug Administration. MAUDE - Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience 2023.Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/textsearch.cfm
Keller EX, Kronenberg P, Tailly T, et al. Laser accessories: surgical fibers, strippers, cleavers, and protective glasses. Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32:330-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000977
Talso M, Emiliani E, Haddad M, et al. Laser fiber and flexible ureterorenoscopy: the safety distance concept. J Endourol. 2016;30:1269-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0209
Juliebo-Jones P, Somani BK, Gjengsto P, et al. Holmium and Thulium fiber laser safety in endourological practice: what does the clinician need to know? Curr Urol Rep. 2023;24:409-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01168-3
Paterson NR, Fitzpatrick R, Blew B, et al. Perceptions and practice patterns of holmium laser goggles in endourological procedures: an unnecessary evil? J Endourol. 2019;33:146-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0432
Bhojani N, Andonian S, Watterson JD, et al. Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Holmium:YAG laser eye safety. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14:380-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.6941
Villa L, Cloutier J, Comperat E, et al. Do we really need to wear proper eye protection when using holmium:YAG laser during endourologic procedures? Results from an ex vivo animal model on pig eyes. J Endourol. 2016;30:332-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0232
Gopal N, Long B, Phillips J, Eshghi M. Endovascular stapler complications during minimally invasive nephrectomy: an updated review of the FDA MAUDE database from 2009-2019. Urology. 2021;153:181-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.010
Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen

European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Group

Vincent de Coninck, Department of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat

European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Group

Etienne Xavier Keller, Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich

European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Group

Lazaros Tzelves, Second Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens

European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Group

How to Cite

Juliebø-Jones, P., Æsøy, M. S., Beisland , C., de Coninck, V., Keller, E. X., Tzelves, L., Gjengstø, P., Arvei Moen, C., Somani, B. K., & Ulvik, Øyvind. (2024). Adverse events related to laser fibers and laser machines during ureteroscopy and stone lithotripsy: Insights from an updated 10-year analysis of the US MAUDE database. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 96(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12374