An international survey on the interpretation of pigmentation using the C class of the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological Classification

Submitted: 16 November 2012
Accepted: 10 June 2013
Published: 2 August 2013
Abstract Views: 1441
PDF: 1841
HTML: 1880
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Skin changes over the gaiter area like pigmentation, lipodermatosclerosis and eczema are a clinical sign of advanced chronic venous disorder. This is documented as C4 in the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysio logical (CEAP) classification. The hypothesis was that there is great variability whether skin changes are recorded as early or advanced disease. The aim was to evaluate different patterns of skin changes by delegates at 3 international venous conferences. Seven high-definition, A4-sized, color photographs were taken of untreated legs with skin changes from patients attending a public hospital venous clinic. They all had venous disease confirmed on duplex with deep or superficial vein reflux >0.5 s. The photographs were displayed and a questionnaire was provided. Delegates familiar with CEAP were asked to choose from 3 C class options for each photograph. The responses were summarized by grouping them into mild (C0-3) and severe (C4-6). A total of 117 delegates completed the questionnaire from 30 countries. A percentage of 60 had practiced phlebology >10 years. The percentages of responders scoring mild (C0-3) and severe disease (C4-6) were: mild/severe=3/96 (photo 1), 65/33 (photo 2), 31/67 (photo 3), 56/34 (photo 4), 74/21 (photo 5), 89/10 (photo 6) and 37/59 (photo 7). The median percentage measure of agreement was 36.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 24.8- 48.9]. The range was 23.2 (95% CI: 10.5-36.0) to 94.8 (95% CI: 90.7-98.9), P<0.001/image, Fisher exact test). This indicates a significant difference of opinion between the appearances of mild and severe clinical disease. Clinical decisions using the C class as a sign of advanced disease may be unreliable if used alone for recording severity, grouping patients or rationing treatment.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Christopher R. Lattimer, Josef Pflug Vascular Unit, Ealing Hospital & Imperial College, London

Vascular Surgeon and Senior Clinical Research Fellow

Evi Kalodiki, Josef Pflug Vascular Unit, Ealing Hospital & Imperial College, London

Vascular Surgeon and Senior Clinical Research Fellow

Mustapha Azzam, Josef Pflug Vascular Unit, Ealing Hospital & Imperial College, London

Vascular Scientist and Ultrasonographer

George Geroulakos, Josef Pflug Vascular Unit, Ealing Hospital & Imperial College, London

Consultant Surgeon and Reader at Imperial College

How to Cite

Lattimer, C. R., Kalodiki, E., Azzam, M., & Geroulakos, G. (2013). An international survey on the interpretation of pigmentation using the C class of the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological Classification. Veins and Lymphatics, 2(1), e15. https://doi.org/10.4081/vl.2013.e15