Management of unscheduled tetanus prophylaxis in Emergency Departments: Point-of-Care implementation as a rapid tool for the evaluation of anti-tetanus antibodies


Submitted: 3 February 2015
Accepted: 9 December 2015
Published: 31 March 2016
Abstract Views: 1539
PDF: 749
HTML: 582
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Andrea Rocchetti Microbiology Unit, Department of Hospital Services, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Rossana Uberti Department of Surgery and Emergency Care, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Carolina Prevaldi Department of Surgery and Emergency Care, Veneto Orientale Local Health Unit 10, Portogruaro, Italy.
  • Clara Maria Lazzara Microbiology Unit, Department of Hospital Services, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Federica Riccio Department of Public Health, Hygiene Section, University of Pavia, Italy.
Background and aim: Each analytical activity, including those carried out in Point of Care (POCT) must be, at law, under the control of Laboratory Medicine. Before the implementation of the rapid tetanus quick stick (TQS) test for the evaluation of the specific tetanus immunisation, a multi-disciplinary and multi-professional group was created. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of Emergency Department (ED) staff to manage and correctly understand the result of TQS test in POCT.
Materials and Methods: This analysis took into consideration 152 patients admitted to ED with traumatic wounds; information on the state of tetanus immunisation at their arrival wasn’t recorded. Blood sample analysis was performed twice. The Laboratory confirmed a 100% concordance between their results and ELISA test (standard criterion). Study design consisted of 2 phases: the first one (50 test) to preliminarily evaluate if any corrective action or improvement of procedures is required, and the second one (102 tests) to confirm the quality of corrective actions.
Results: The concordance of results between TQS test in Laboratory and POCT test in ED was 80% in the first phase and 95% in the second one.
Conclusions: The use of the rapid TQS test is a valuable tool; however, to avoid serious mistakes of interpretation, periodic checks on the quality of the results must be arranged.

Rocchetti, A., Uberti, R., Prevaldi, C., Lazzara, C. M., & Riccio, F. (2016). Management of unscheduled tetanus prophylaxis in Emergency Departments: Point-of-Care implementation as a rapid tool for the evaluation of anti-tetanus antibodies. Microbiologia Medica, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/mm.2016.5082

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations