0
0
0
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures

Authors

Every year, a great number of people die for bloodstream infections, especially by too late or inappropriate pharmacological treatment. The principal laboratory test for this type of infections is the blood culture; its limit is a turnaround time of about 96 hours. The aim of this work was to compare direct susceptibility testing with the automated VITEK 2 system. Fifty blood cultures, positive for Gram-negative bacteria, were processed for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, meropenem and colistin with VITEK 2 and direct susceptibility testing by Kirby-Bauer or E-test methods. We found 93.7% correlation with 5.0% minor errors, 0.5% very major errors and 0.8% major errors. Piperacillin-tazobactam has shown the lowest percentage of correlation (79%) and the highest percentage of errors (21%). To conclude, direct susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures has shown promising results, rendering this method useful for giving to clinicians preliminary informations for therapy.

How to Cite

Zappavigna, A., Cavatorta, E., Chiarabini, R., Schiavo, R., Padrini, D., Reboli, C., & Confalonieri, M. (2014). Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures. Microbiologia Medica, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/mm.2013.3272