Accuracy of different thresholds for the anti-HIV avidity index

Submitted: 17 February 2014
Accepted: 17 February 2014
Published: 31 March 2008
Abstract Views: 1069
PDF: 1148
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Surveillance programs for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are based on the reporting of newly diagnosed cases. In order to guarantee a more accurate estimate of the trends and behaviours of infected people, simple and reliable methods aimed at identifying recent (< 6 months) HIV infections are needed. We evaluated the accuracy of the avidity index (AI) of anti-HIV antibodies on 357 serum samples obtained from 127 subjects for whom an estimated date of seroconversion was calculated on the basis of the interval between the last negative and first positive anti-HIV test result.The ROC curve analysis performed at different thresholds of the AI showed that a cutoff of 0.80 (93.0% sensitivity and 98.5% specificity) yields the best overall accuracy (95.8%) and should be employed for surveillance purposes, whereas the application of the anti-HIV AI on individual cases is not recommended.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Galli, C., Bossi, V., Regine, V., Rodella, A., Manca, N., Camoni, L., & Suligoi, B. (2008). Accuracy of different thresholds for the anti-HIV avidity index. Microbiologia Medica, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/mm.2008.2599